SS RT 
ag — 
2 ae 
204 THE SNAKE. 
do get up into trees, then I take the liberty to re- 
mark that he has told us nothing new. 
I have been in the midst of snakes for many years: 
I have observed them on the ground, on trees, in 
bushes, on bedsteads, and upon old mouldering 
walls ; but never in my life have I seen a snake 
pursue a retreating prey. I am fully satisfied, in 
my own mind, that it is not in a snake’s nature to 
do so. A snake would follow its retreating prey in 
a tree with just about as much success as a grey- 
hound would follow a hare through the mazes of a 
thick wood. Snakes are always in a quiescent state 
just before they seize their prey; and their mode of 
capturing it is by an instantaneous spring, consisting 
of a bound which never exceeds two thirds of the 
length of the reptile’s body. - 
As: we are now on snakes, and as Mr. Taylor 
informs us that the names of his birds and animals 
“are corrected from the splendid work of Audubon,” 
I beg leave to draw his particular attention to plate 
21. ofthat work. It represents a rattlesnake attack- 
ing a mocking-bird’s nest. Mr. Swainson, in his 
critique upon it in the Magazine of Natural History, 
i. 48, 49., seems lost in admiration at its excellence. 
He says (after lauding plate 17.), “ The same poetic 
sentiment and masterly execution characterises this 
picture.” ““ Pictoribus atque poetis,’ &c. The 
mouth of the rattlesnake is wide open, and the fangs 
are the first things to attract the inspector’s notice, 
being by far the most conspicuous feature in it. 
There they are on elephant [folio] with their points” 
curved upwards! The artist, in his notes on the 
