86 



ON A GENERAL! 



or not with the biometric 

 shows their possibility, bi 

 they are inadequate. Th 

 gamete there is nothing 

 regression, skew distribm 

 biometric description of 

 generalised theory here ( 

 values of the constants of 



It will }>e time enough 

 when there is far better e 

 of observation, and have 

 numerical results of whic 

 Given such neo-Mendeliai 

 method of applying the 1 

 excessively laborious, and 

 of their investigation. 1 

 weeks of labour may be 

 when applied to sexually 

 principles stated which 

 experiments of the Men< 

 investigation, but it is idl 

 Principles remain in a sta 



Any combination of th 

 with fertility correlated A\ 



J 



type, would emphasise tl 

 but such hypotheses woul 



(ft + o 



Such a formula would t 

 these possibilities actually 



Such loading of the p 

 probably of associated coi 

 deduce better values for 

 abolish not only the simp] 

 involve lengthy prelimim 

 any effective formula coul 



* Toss two pennies, and the 

 n (HH + 2HT + TT). Load one or 

 their proportions will be far from n 







n to the bnnul i- 



<>f ancesfcftklB X3QHI 

 ti:H!fi. But it doex the 



enough to acctoini flu 



iln-r i'inr j .r MVSH s^ciici-:il 



xiboaqqA miifoii? ,widq8 n io -wolmilS oiJeiiojA'dll nO .Omul) . 



\K , K 1 <>> ift rao-rt haolJaituH t'-nbnyjipj lo nuit-'f a/11 Sniyiji 



.)MbpJ .A .loll 7ff ,88-)T4'(fT O lo 



Ml 



,K08 .\<rt .A .. 



T ,BOS IOT .A . 



ill. 



jitoau1 i' 

 AWJrtHi 



method i 



.OII-T8 .qq ;K*f ,R<)8 .fo ,A ,. 



formula, but 



t} mate results 



imple general 



ie iivliridisation 



mathematical 



u MS Mendelian 



!>i.iuogamy, or 

 individual or of 



. U- too low ; 



l.'it i 'a- proportions of 



MI i;!et -but very 

 ..!-i\ Pliable us to 



.-id collateral correlations. But it would 

 amenta! Mendelian formula, it we.. 

 unogamv, fertility, and inv 



be propounded. 



the 



s will closely })proximato to tJ 







