TABLE OF CONTENTS.* 



Argument of the Honourable Sir James S. Winter, K. C 543-598 



Question 1 1 543-572 



Newfoundland legislation not discriminatory 544 



Position taken by Mr. Turner 544-6 



Regulations examined in detail 547 



Statute of 1862 547 



Americans never fished for herring, but purchased it. 547-8, 



550, 552 



Inshore cod-fishery practically insignificant 549,553,581 



No mackerel in Newfoundland waters 551 



Regulations of herring fishery of most importance 551 



Statute of 1892 553 



Resuni6 of Newfoundland's position 554-5 



Legislation of 1905 555 



Sunday-fishing: Act of 1876 556 



Statute of 1877 557 



1879 558 



1882 559 



1891 559 



1884 559-62 



1889 562 



1892 563 



1893 563 



1905 564-6 



Fishery Regulations of 1908 567 



General observations on regulations objected to by the 



United States 568 



Bultows f 568-9 



Purse-seines 570-2 



Question 6 



A primd facie case _1 572-3 



Words "coast" and "coasts" 5734 



Reason for distinction between the Labrador and other specified 



coasts 575 



Word "coast" in third article of treaty of 1783 575.578 



Americans have no right to fish in any of the bays of New- 

 foundland 577 



Negotiations leading up to treaty of 1818 578-84 



Newfoundland cod-fishery practically a bank fishery 584 



No right of shelter by treaty in bays on west coast 586 



Intention of negotiators in 1818 587-9. 591-2 



Plural of " coast " used in speaking of Labrador because there 

 are three distinct coasts 589-91 



* The page references given in this Table of Contents are to the pages of the original 

 publication, which are shown inset in this publication. 



VII 



