2262 NORTH ATLANTIC COAST FISHERIES ARBITRATION. 



Regulations under 52 Viet., cap. 7. (Br. App., 718, 719. 1890- 

 1891.) 



Stringent restrictions as to methods of fishing. 

 1890 rules not to apply to French coast (Regulation 31). 

 Consolidated Statutes, cap. 124. (Br. App., 725. 1892.) 

 Stringent regulations. 

 28. Proviso saving treaty rights. 



Consolidated Statutes, cap. 129. (Br. App., 727. 1892.) 

 Restricting exportation and sale of bait-fishes. 

 22. Proviso saving treaty rights. 

 61 Viet, cap. 3. (Br. App., 731. 1898.) 



9. Power to regulate fisheries, forbid destruction of fish and fishing 

 without licence. 



10. Proviso saving treaty rights. 



Regulations under 1898 Act.' (Br. App., 767. 1905.) 

 Regulations under 1898 Act. (Br. App., 760. 1908.) 



5 Ed. VII, cap. 4. (Br. App., 757. 1905.) 

 Foreign Fishing Vessels Act. 



7. Proviso saving treaty rights. 



6 Ed. VII, cap. 1. (Br. App'., 758. 1906.) 

 Foreign Fishing Vessels Act. 



14. Proviso saving treaty rights. 

 17. Repeals Act of 1905. 



United States New Jersey. 

 General Statutes, 1896. (Br. App.," 785. 1826.) 

 Only resident citizens of New Jersey to seine. 



Delaware. 



Statutes, cap. 72. (Br. App., 788. 1871.) 

 1. No fishing in Delaware Bay except by citizens of the State. 

 8. June-August. Certain gill seines forbidden. 

 9. Sunday fishing forbidden. 



Maryland. 



Statutes, cap!" 441. (Br. App., 793. 1896.) 

 Restricts netting in Chesapeake Bay. 



NOTE. 



As pointed out by Sir Robert Finlay, in his argument at p. 1154 

 fp. 198-9 supra~], the Appendices to the British Case and Counter- 

 Case do not contain all the laws passed since 1818 by the British Colo- 

 nies other than Newfoundland for the regulation of the fisheries. 



The statutes of New Brunswick and Lower Canada subsequent to 

 1818, which appear in the Appendices, were printed not for the pur- 

 pose of showing the course of legislation in those colonies with refer- 

 ence to the regulation of the fisheries, but for other purposes, for 

 example, to show jurisdiction exercised over bays, or to give the pro- 

 visions of the statutes referred to in the Marcy Circular, &c. 



Many other statutes regulating the fisheries were passed from time 

 to time by the Dominion of Canada and by the Colonies which after- 

 wards constituted the Dominion. If it is desired, a list of these 

 statutes and copies thereof will be furnished to the Tribunal and to 

 Counsel for the United States, and all proper opportunity will be 

 afforded for the examination of the volumes which contain these 

 statutes. 



