2414 NORTH ATLANTIC COAST FISHERIES ARBITRATION. 



Ewart, John S., K. C. Continued. 

 Question 5 Continued. 



Everett to Aberdeen: Aug. 10, 1843, B. C. Ap., ISO, Everett misread treaty, 

 1280. May 25, 1844, B. C. Ap., 1SS, "coasts" meant to include bays, 

 creeks, and harbors except Bay of Fundy, 1281-2. Mar. 25, 1845, B. 

 C. Ap., 143, 144: bays renounced are those which might be entered, 1237; 

 right to fish in Bay of Fundy, 1286. 



Everett to Ingersoll, Dec. 4, 1852, U. 5. C. Ap., 535, publication of Everett's 

 letter to Aberdeen. 1292. 



Everett's arrangement in 1845, abandonment of American contention as to 

 bays, 1290. 



Everett's letter to Aberdeen, publication of, Everett to Ingersoll, Dec. 4, 

 1852, U. 8. C. Ap., 535, 1292. 



Exclusion actually practiced from all bays, 1845-52, GRAY, 1290. 



Falkland, Stanley to: Nov. 28, 1842, U. S. C. Ap., 1046, regulations prac- 

 tically agreed to by Americans, 1279-80. May 19, 1845, B. C. Ap., 146, 

 relaxation of British position, 1258. Sept. 17, 1845, B. C. Ap., 151, 

 seizure of "Argus" as evidence of headland theory repudiated, 1229-30. 



Falkland to Stanley, Sept. 17, 1844, B. C. Ap., 136, relaxation of rule in 

 regard to Bay of Fundy, 1283. 



Farnham, 1: 25, American. 3-mile contention not supported, 1339. 



Fillmore disagrees with Webster, Crampton to Malmesbury, Aug. 9. 1852, 

 B. C. Ap., 168, 1295. 



Fillmore 's message, Dec. 6, 1852, U. S. C. Ap., 545, opposition of colonists 



to Great Britain, 1308. 



1 . Fillmore, Webster to, Aug. 4, 1852, U. S. C. C. Ap., 166, Senate discussion 

 of fisheries, 1294-5. 



Fillmore to Webster, July 20, 1852, U. S. C, C. Ap., 160, negotiations with 

 Mr. Crampton, 1292-3. 



Fishermen's and territorial theories, practical difference, FITZPATRICK, 1245. 



"Fishermen's" contrasted with "territorial" theory, U. S. A., 145, 146, 

 148, 198, 1243-46. 



"Fishermen's theory": U. S. C., 65, 66, 76, 77, 95, 1243. Based on "shelter 

 theory," 1237. Contradicts treaty, 1237. Does 3-mile limit run from 

 bays or from shores, 1234. Does not involve territoriality, 1234. Dobbin 

 to Shubrick, July 14, 1853, U. S. C. Ap., 169, 1302-3. Espoused by Marcy, 

 1236. Is simply 3 miles from coast line, 1239. Not mentioned in Web- 

 ster's incomplete memorandum, U. S. C. Ap., 527, 1298. Supported, 

 Gallatin and Rush to Adams, Oct. 20, 1818, B. C. Ap., 94, 1261-2. Origin 

 of, Paine 's report, Dec. 29, 1839, B. C. Ap., 121, 1277-8. Supported, Rush 

 to Marcy, July 18, 1853, U. S. C. Ap., 549, 1263. 



FITZPATRICK: International acceptance of 3-mile limit, 1320. Practical 

 difference between territorial and fishermen's theories, 1245. Treaty of 

 1806, 5-mile limit would include bays, 1328. 

 .Five-mile limit would include bays, treaty of 1806, FITZPATRICK, 1328. 



Foster, Halifax commission, B. C. C. Ap., 18S, 3-mile limit not accepted 

 prior to 1783, 1322. 



France, treaties of. See Treaties cited. 



Franco-American controversy of 1821-3: 1273-75. Concerned treaty coast, 

 LAMMASCH, 1274. 



Fuca Straits, boundary line in, Warren's argument criticized, 1335-6. Ter- 

 ritorial line established by agreement, 1257. 



