2450 NORTH ATLANTIC COAST FISHERIES ARBITRATION. 



Fiulay, Right Honorable Sir Robert Bannatyne Continued. 

 Questions 3 and 4 Continued. 



Negotiators, intention of in 1818, as basis of United States argument, 399-400. 



New Brunswick, statutes of. See Statutes cited. 



Newfoundland's powers limited, Root to Duraiid, Oct. 19, 1905, B. C. Ap. t 

 491, 398. 



Newfoundland, statutes of. See Statutes cited. 



Nova Scotia, statutes of. See Statutes cited. 



Questions 3 and 4 may be considered together, 393-4. 



Reid, Grey to: Feb. 2, 1906, B. C. Ap., 495, light dues, report, 397-8, June 

 20, 1907, U. S. C. Ap., 1007, exemption of local fishing vessels from light 

 dues, 404. 



Reid, Root to, June 30, 1906, B. C. Ap., 501, light dues and report not condi- 

 tion precedent to fishing, 398. 



Reid to Grey, Oct. 6, 1906, B. C. Ap., 506, light dues, report, possibility of, 

 396. 



Report and entry at customhouse: Colonial statutes, 395. Excused if impos- 

 sible, 401. Imperial statute, 1775, B. C. Ap., 543, 402. Not condition prece- 

 dent to fishing, Root to Reid, June 30, 1906, B. C. Ap., 501, 398. 



Report: Canada, Revised Statutes, 1906, B. C. Ap., 651, 395. Grey to Reid, 

 Feb. 2, 1906, B. C. Ap., 495, 397-8. Modus vivendi of 1907, 396. Not incon- 

 sistent with treaty righte, 398. Possibility of, Reid to Grey, Oct. 6, 1906, 

 B. C. Ap., 506, 396. Required upon entry into harbor, universal rule, 394. 



Root to Reid, June 30, 1906, B. C. Ap., 501, light dues and report not con- 

 dition precedent to fishing, 398. 



Root to Durand, Oct. 19, 1905, . C. Ap., 49t, Newfoundland's powers 

 limited, 398. 



Sabine's report, light dues, U. S. C. Ap., 1206, 1276, 404. 



Servitudes as basis of United States argument, 399-400. 



Statutes cited: Canada: Revised Statutes 1906, B. C. Ap., 651, report, 395. 

 Imperial: 1775, B. C. Ap., 543, entry and report, 402. New Brunswick: 

 1810, B. C. Ap., 60S, light dues, 404. Newfoundland: 1834, B. C. Ap., 

 694, light dues, 404; 1839, B. C. Ap., 697, light dues, 404; 1852, B. C. Ap., 

 699, light dues, 404; 1855, B. C. Ap., 700, light dues, 404; 1898, B. C. Ap., 

 733, report 395; 1899, B. C. Ap., 754, light dues, 404J.1908, B. C. Ap., 733, 

 395. Nova Scotia: 1787, B. C. Ap., 591, light dues, 404; 1793, B. C. Ap., 

 594, light dues, 404; 1809, B. C. Ap., 602, light dues, 404; 1812, B. C. Ap., 

 604, light dues, 404. 



Twiss, p. 304, light dues, 403. 



United States argument based on servitudes and intention of negotiators in 



1818, 399. 

 Question 5, pp. 8, 16-20, 407-469. (June 6, 17, 1910.) 



Acquiescence not basis of claim to Delaware Bay, 411. 



Adams to American commissioners, July 28, 1818, B. C. Ap., 84, "bays" not 

 defined, 414. 



Adams to Russell: 1822, B. C. C. Ap., 163, "bays," not defined, 413. May 3, 

 1822, B. C. C. Ap., 161, 413. 



Alaska boundary arbitration, British position, maritime jurisdiction, 460-464; 

 not inconsistent with present position, 464. 



"Alleganean," case of, maritime jurisdiction, 4 Moore's Int. Arb., p. 4333, 

 447. 



American commissioners, Adams to, July 28, 1818, B. C. Ap., 84, "bays" not 

 defined, 414. 



Argument of United States as to 6-mile bays, 419-422. 



