INDEX TO ORAL ARGUMENTS. 2489 



Boot, Honorable Elihu Continued. 

 Question 5 Continued. 



Maritime jurisdiction: Abandonment of claims to King's Chambers, 2164. 

 American position in 1818, American proposal, Sept. 17, 1818, Am. St. Pap., 

 4 For Rel, 337, 2169. Bathurst to Baker, Sept. 7, 1815, 2171-4. Controversy 

 limited to matters within, 2145-6. Ewart'sargument,2147. Fixed by statute, 

 Lammasch, 2162-4. Fitzmaurice, Feb. 21, 1907, 2166-7. Foster's report 

 (Canadian minister of marine and fisheries), U. S. C. Ap., 812, 2163. Hol- 

 land and Auckland's report, Nov. 14, 1806, B. C. Ap., 61, 2152, 2155, 2158, 

 2164. Institute of International Law, 6-mile limit, 2150. Kimberley to 

 Lisgar, Feb. 16, 1871, U. S. C. Ap., 636, 2173. LAMMASCH: effect of nature of 

 coast, 2158; abandonment of claims to King's Chambers, 2164; effect of cir- 

 cumstances on British position, 1806, 2156; limit of, 2146; limit fixed by 

 statute, 2162^4; places without marine league, 2173. Lansdowne, Nov. 11, 

 1907, 2168. de Martens, 2152. Monroe and Pinckney's report, Nov. 11, 

 1806, U.S. C. C. Ap., 95, 2155. Must be asserted, 2150; Chitty, 2152, 2162; 

 Robson, 2151. Newcastle to Bannerman, Aug. 3, 1863, U. S. C. Ap., 

 1083, 2163. Newfoundland claims, Falkland to Russell, May 8, 1841, B. C. 

 Ap., Ig7, 2162. Norway claims 4 miles, 2150. Nova Scotia act of 1836, 



2163. Pinckney-Monroe report, Jan. 3, 1807, U. S. C. C. Ap., 96, 2156. 

 Positions of Great Britain and United States in 1806, 2150. Queen v. Keyn, 

 L. R. (1876), 2 Ex. Div., 63, abandonment of claims to King's Chambers, 



2164. Reference by negotiators of 1818, 2147. 

 De Martens, maritime jurisdiction, 2152. 

 Massachusetts Bay, 2177. 



Miramichi Bay, 2151, 2153, 2160, 2167, 2188, 2189. 



Mitchell's map not used in 1818, 2148. 



Monroe, Adams to, Sept. 19, 1815, B. C. Ap., 265, Jaseur incident, 2178. 



Monroe and Pinckney, Madison to, May 17, 1806, B. C. Ap., 60, bays, 2154. 



Monroe and Pinckney reports, Nov. 11, 1806, Jan. 3, 1807, U. &. <7. C. Ap., 



95, 96, maritime jurisdiction, 2155, 2156. 

 Moray Firth case, 3-mile limit, 2166, 2168. 

 Negotiators in 1818 referred to maritime jurisdiction, 2147. 

 Newfoundland, statutes of. See Statutes cited. 



Newcastle-Bannerman, Aug. 3, 1863, U. S. C. Ap., 108S, maritime juris- 

 diction, 2163. 

 North Sea coasts, 2159. 



North Sea convention, 1882, 3-mile limit, 2161. 

 Notre Dame Bay, 2153. 

 Norway claims 4 miles jurisdiction, 2150. 

 Nova Scotia, act of 1836, maritime jurisdiction, 2163; asserting territorial 



waters, 2161-2. See also Statutes cited. 

 Opinion of law officers of the Crown, 2142. 



Pinckney and Monroe, Madison to, bays, May 17, 1806, B. C. Ap., 60, 2154. 

 Pinckney and Monroe reports, Jan. 3, 1807, Nov. 11, 1806, U. S. C. C. Ap., 



95, 96, maritime jurisdiction, 2155, 2156. 

 Placentia Bay, 2151, 2153, 2160. 

 Queen v. Keyn, L. R. (1876), 2 Ex. Div., 6S, abandonment of claims to 



King's Chambers, 2164. 



Regulations, shore, statutes, Chaleur and Miramichi Bays, 2188-9. 

 Renunciatory clause in treaty of 1818: 2145; 2174; 2189-90; British proposal, 



a grant, 2190; "any" in, LAMMASCH, 2182-4; Robson's view, 2189. 

 Robson: abandonment of claims to King's Chambers, 2164; jurisdiction must 



be asserted, 2151; renunciatory clause, 2189. 

 92909 VOL 1213 17 



