INDEX TO ORAL ARGUMENTS. 2521 



Warren, Honorable Charles B. Continued. 

 Question 5 Continued. 



Cod fishing existed in bays prior to mackerel fishery, 1157-1163: Aberdeen, 

 Everett to, Aug. 10, 1843, B. C. Ap., 131, May 25, 1844, U. S. C. Ap., 478, 

 1162. Adams, pp. 211-215, 223, 1160, 1161. Adams' diary, Nov. 25, 1782, 

 B. C. C. Ap., 101, cod and haddock in bays, 1159. Bay of Fundy, herring, 

 mackerel, shad, and cod in, Johnston, attorney general of Nova Scotia, 

 Sept. 17, 1844, B. C. Ap., 139, 1159. Davis in United States Senate, Aug. 3, 

 1852, B. C. Ap., 167, 1162. Everett to Ingersoll, Dec. 4, 1852, U. S. C. Ap., 

 640, 1162. Forsyth to Stevenson, Feb. 20, 1841, B. C. Ap., 124, 1162. 

 Gloucester, Mass., memorial to Webster, July, 1852, U.S.C. C. Ap., 159, 1161. 

 LAMMASCH, cod, haddock, herring, mackerel in bays, 1158. Lawrence to 

 Webster, Aug. 10, 1852, U. S. C. Ap., 517, conversation with Malmes- 

 bury, 1162. Leonard to Sullivan, Nov. 10, 1802, B. C. Ap., 57, 1159. 

 Palmerston, Stevenson to, Mar. 27, 1841, B. C. Ap., 126, 1162. Perley's 

 report, U. S. C. C. Ap., 580, 1161. Sabine's report, U. S. C. Ap., 1281, 

 1161; mackerel fishery, 1158; U. S. C. Ap., 1287, new construction treaty 

 forfeits one-third cod and mackerel fisheries, 1159. Soul6 in United States 

 Senate, Aug. 12, 1852, B. C. Ap., 173-4, 1162. Upshur to Everett, July 

 30, 1843, U. S. C. Ap., 472, 1162. 



Cod in bays, Adams' diary, Nov. 25, 1782, B. C. C. Ap., 101, 1159. LAM- 

 MASCH, 1158. 



Cod in Bay of Fundy, Johnston, attorney general of Nova Scotia, Sept. 17, 

 1844, B. C. Ap., 139, 1150. 



Common law, English, adopts Grotius' views on territorial jurisdiction, 1224. 



Commonwealth v. Manchester, 152 Mass. Rep., 30, 139 U. S., 240, 6-mile 

 bays, 3-mile limit, 1086, 1088. 



Commonwealth v. Peters, 12 Metcalf's Rep., S87 (Mass.), "sight" as test of 

 jurisdiction, 1082-3. 



Conception Bay case, L. R. (1877) % App. Cos., 394, 1087, 1204-5. Based on 

 narrow ground, Holland, Letters, p. 133, 1205. Decision narrow, Finlay, 

 Alaskan Boundary Arbitration, Proceedings, 5:237, 1205. 



Conception Bay, jurisdiction over not acquiesced in by United States, 

 1087, 1206. 



Cope v. Doherty, De Gex & Jones, 614, jurisdiction, continued exercise 

 and international acquiescence therein, 1221. 



Cow Bay Head, 1169. 



Crampton, Buchanan to, Aug. 19, 1848, U. 8. C. C. Ap., 624, Great Britain not 

 affected by United States-Mexico boundary treaty, 1846, 1089-1090. 



Crampton, Malmesbury to, Aug. 11, 1852, B. C. Ap., 172, British Admiral's 

 instructions same for many years, 1184. 



Crampton to Malmesbury: Aug. 2, 1852, B. C. Ap., 157, Webster's circular 

 and Fillmore's instructions, 1182-3. Aug. 9, 1852, B. C. Ap., 168, Web- 

 ster's nonacceptance of British construction of bay, 1183. 



Creasy, p. 232, maritime jurisdiction, 1060. 



Creeks comprised in maritime jurisdiction, 1059. 



Creeks in 1818 referred to those within 3-mile limit, 1130. 



Crowell's report, Feb. 10, 1852, fishing in bays, 1845-52, U. S. C. C. Ap., 

 209, 1179. 



Curing, fishing, or drying, "within the exclusive British jurisdiction" cause 

 of differences prior to 1818, 1041. 



Curing: instructions, Adams to Gallatin and Rush, July 28, 1818, U. S. C. 

 Ap., 304, 1109. Monroe to Adams, Feb. 27, 1816, U. S. C. Ap., 287, 1106. 

 92909 VOL 1213 19 



