Crustacea described hy Bate and Westwood. 8.3 



100. Gammarus locusta (Linne), p. 378. 



101. ^enwiWrnMS, Bate, p. 384, = ? il/cem Batei, Norman (see 



Walker, Ann. & Mag. Nat. Hist. ser. 6, vol. xv. 1895, p. 471). 



102. • EdwarcMi, Bate, p. 386 (not as yet recognized by any 



other author). 



103. pw^^.r (De Geer), p. 388. 



104. dubius, Johnston, p. 397, = ? 



105. maculatus, Johnston, p. 399,= 6rV(»n5?rtro^wi's maculatus 



(Johnston). 



106. Megamcera semiservata, Bate, p. i.O\,=zCeradocxis semiserratus 



(Bate). 



107. longimanus (Leach, MS.), p. 403, = J/(:pra othonis (H. 



Milne-Edwards), rj . 



108. othonis (H. Milne-Edwards), p. 405,-=3Icera otJionis (H. 



Milne-Edwards), $ . 



109. Aided, Bate, p. 407, = Melita ohtusata (Montagu), $ . 



110. brevicaudata, Bate, p. 409, = Elasmopus rapax, Costa. 



111. Eiscladus longicaudatus. Bate and Westwood, p. 4\2, = Pliotis 



longicaudata (Bate and Westwood). 



112. Amphithoe ruhricata (Montagu), p. 418. 



113. littorina, Bate, p. 422,= Amphithoe ruhricata (Mon- 

 tagu), ?. 



114. albonuiculata, Bate and Westwood (nee Kroyer), p. 426. 



The specimen figured is in my collection. It is Podoceropsis 

 excavata, Bate, $ , The long setae of the antennae and the 

 first gnathopods as drawn agree with Podoceropsis, but the 

 specimen shows nothing of the strong upturned third segment 

 of metasome or the Amphithoe-like last uropod of Bate and 

 Westwood's figure. 



115. • gammaroides. Bate, p. 427, = Pleonexes gammaroides. 



Bate, c? • 



116. Sunamphithoe haimdus. Bate, p. 430, = PJeoytexes gammaroides, 



Bate, ?. 

 117. conformata, Bate, t^. 432, = Snnatnjyhithoe jielagic^t (H. 



Milne-Edwards). 

 118. Podocerus pvlchellus (Leach), p. 43^,=.BruzeUella* falcata 



(Montagu), S- 

 * I have examined the types of the genera Podocerus and Jassa in the 

 British Museum, and fully confirm what Messrs. Stebbing and Walker 

 have written upon them, that Podocerus varier/atus, Leach (as interpreted 

 by Milne-Edwards's figure in ' Regne Animal de Cuvier," but not 

 P. varieffatus, B. & W.), is Platophimn Dancinii, and that Jassa pelaffica, 

 Leach (but not of B. & W.), is the same as Podocerus capUlatus, B. it W. 

 Bruzelius long ago restricted the use of Jassa to the species last men- 

 tioned, which has only a rudimentary appendage (scarcely visible with a 

 high power) to the antennules. This use must be maintained, and not 

 Parajassa as suggested by Stebbing. I have therefore found it necessary 

 to institute a genus Bruzetie/la, with B. fnkata, Montagu, as its tvpe. 



G* 



