84 Canon A. M. Norman — Tlf vised Nomenclature of 



119. Podocerus vanegntus. Bate and Westwood (nee Leach), p. 439, = 



BruzelieJ/a pusilla (Sars), 5 • 



120. capillatus, Eatlike, ]}. 442. = Jassa peJagict, Leach (nee 



B. & W.). 



121. falcafns (Montagu), i^. 445, = Bruzeliella falcaia (Mon- 

 tagu), d junior. 



122. pelagicus (Bate and Westwood) (nee Leach), p. 447,= 



Bruzeliella falcata (ATontagu), $ . 



123. ocias, Bate, p. 450, = BruzeUella ocia (Bate). 



124. Cerapus ahditus, Templetou, p. 455, = ErichtJionius abditus 



Templeton, S . 



125. difformis (H, Milne-Edwards), p. 457, = Eric7itJion{i(S 



difformis, H. Milne-Edwards, S • 



126. Dercothoe punctatus, H. Milne-Edwards, p. 461,:= EricJuJionius 



difformis, H. Milne-Edwards, $. 



127. Siplioncecetes Uipicus, Bate and Westwood (nee Kroyer), p. 465, 



Slphoneecetes Whitei (Gosse), J • 



128. Whitei, Gosse, p. 4Q~ , = Siphonoecetes Whitei (Gosse), $, 



= C. CoUetti, Boeck. 



129. crassico7'nis. Bate, p. 469, =: Cerapus crassicornis (Bate). 



130. Ncenia tuberulosa, Bate, p. 412, = PodoceropsisSophice, Boeck, c^ . 

 1.31. rimapalmata. Bate, p. 41 4, = Podoceropsis excavaia (Bate), 



6 . 



132. excavata, Bate, p. 41 6, = Podoceropsis excavata (Bate), 5 ■ 



133. undata, Bate, p. 411 ,=■ Podoceropsis Sophice, Boeck, $ . 



134. Cyrtophium Darwinii, Bate, p. 4'61,= Plat ophium variegatum 



(Leach) *. 



135. Cratippus tenuipes. Bate, p. 4^5,= Colomastix pusilla, Grube. 



136. Dryope irrorata, Bate, p. 488,= Unciola irrorata (Bate), 5 . 



137. crenatipalma, Bate, p. 490,= Unciola irrorata (Bate), J . 



138. Corophium longicorne, Latreille, p. 493,= Corophium volutator 



(Pallas), S- 



139. Bonellii, Bate and West-wood (nee Milne-Edwards), 



p. 491 ,= Corophium affine, Bruzelius, $ . 



140. crassicorne, Bruzelius, p. 499, (^ . 



141. Chelura terebrans, Philippi, p. 503. 



Vol. II. 



142. Listrigonus exulans, Kroyer, p. 5, = Hyperia galha (Montagu), 



(S junior. 



* I think that, considering the inadequate description of the genus 

 Podocerus and its erroneous use for nearly one hundred years, the name 

 ought to be excluded from an altered use. 



