C48 Mr. K. Andersen on the Species and 



LXXIII. — A List of the Species and Subspecies of the Genus 

 Jlliinoloplius, with some Notes on their Geographical 

 Distribution. By Knud Andersen. 



The present paper gives a brief summary of the systematic, 

 phylogenetic, and zoogeograpliical conclusions at winch I 

 have arrived by a study of the bats of the genus Rhinolophus 

 preserved in the British Museum and the United States 

 National Museum. For the details that have served as a 

 basis for the conclusions I must refer to my former papers on 

 this subject*. 



A Sijstemat'c List of the Species and Subspecies. 

 A. 'The Rhiuolophus simplex Group. 



1. Rh. simplex, K. And. — Lombok f. 



2. Rh.megaphyllus, i. E. Gray. — Eastern Australia; Louisiade Archi- 



pelago. 

 2«. Rh. me(/aphyllus f. typica. — Eastern Australia (Queensland, 



N.'S, Wales). 

 2b. Rh. megaphyllus monachus, K. And. — Louisiade Arcliipelago 

 (St. Aignan's Isl.). 

 ? Rh. keyensis, Ptrs. — " Key Islands." 



3. Rh. truncatiis, Ptis, — Batchian. 



4. R/i. 7unins, K. And. — Goram Island. 



5. Rh. celebensls, K. And. — Celebi'S (Makassar, Menado). 



* Andersen and Matschie, " Ueber einige geographische Formen der 

 Untevgattung Ewyalus,''^ SB. Ges. natiuf. Fr. Berlin, 1904, 

 no. 6, pp. 71-83. 

 Andersen, " Five new Rhinolophi from Africa," Ann. & Mag. Nat. 



Hist. (7) xiv., Nov. 1904, pp. 378-388. 

 Id., " On von Heuglin's, Riippell's, and SundevaU's Types of African 



Rhmo/ojjhi;' t. c, Dec. 1904, pp. 451-458. 

 Id., " Further Descriptions of new Rhinolophi from Africa," op. cit, 



(7) XV., Jan. 1905, pp. 70-76. 

 Id., " On the Bats of the Rhinolophus pJiilippinensis Group, with 

 Descriptions of Five new Species," op. cit. (7) xvi., Aug. 1905, 

 pp. 243-257. 

 Id., " On the Bats of the Rhinolophus arcuatus Group, with Descrip- 

 tions of Five new Forms," t. c., Sept. 1905, pp. 281-288. 

 Id., " On the Bats of tlie Rhinolophics macrotis Group, with Descrip- 

 tions of Two new Forms," t. c, Sept. 1905, pp. 289-292. 

 Id., " On some Bats of the Genus Rhinolophus, with Remarks on 

 their Mutual Affinities, and Descriptions of Twenty-six new 

 Forms," Proc. Zool. Soc. 1905, ii. (Oct.) pp. 75-145, pis. iii., iv. 

 t When not otherwise stated, the record of the geographical distri- 

 bution of the species and subspecies is based exclusively on examples 

 examined by myself (a few localities quoted from literature are printed 

 between inverted commas). 



