112 BULLETIN 1050, U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 



SUCJ 



h that vapor molecules remaining on said surfaces do not crowd 

 one another: (3) on the size of the particles, the smaller particles 

 having less gravitational power; and (4) on the extent to which the 

 substances in the soil act as solids or crystals with only exterior sur- 

 faces available, as spongy masses capable of obsorption, or as indi- 

 vidual molecules each of which may attract and retain under partial 

 control a sufficient number of molecules, so that in the aggregate the 

 conditions are those of a liquid. 



The factors that affect the rate of absorption are far less impor- 

 tant, hut might be briefly mentioned, as follows: (1) The size of 

 3oil spaces as affecting free passage of vapor molecules: (2) the 

 number of chances for a given molecule in motion through a given 

 space to encounter an attractive force too strong for it (this has to 

 do with the number of particles per unit of volume, as well as size 

 <>f air spaces); (3) the density of the soil particles; (4) the density 

 of the vapor molecules as affected by tempera t lire and whole pressure; 

 5) the conductivity of the soil, governing the rate at which the 

 heat of condensation can be eliminated from the soil mass. 



This examination of established facts and theory regarding vapor 

 condensation in soils leads to the recent efforts by Bates (105) to 

 show that the moisture of soils does exhibit a definite partial vapor 

 pressure corresponding to that of a solution, and that the vapor 

 transfer method has many latent possibilities, li should he stated 

 thai these investigations are not yet complete or convincing, but in 

 some respects they have gone farther than any other- and an- worth 

 mentioning at least as suggestions for further effort. 



The vapor-transfer method of Bates. — In it- simplest form the 

 vapor transfer method is similar to the plasmolytic method in at- 

 tempting to find a point of osmotic equilibrium between the -oil 

 moisture and solutions of known concentration. In this case equi- 

 librium must be shown by the cessation of transfer of water, through 

 vapor, from the soil to the solution, or the reverse. It would he 

 possible to take a number of samples of a given soil at a known-mois- 

 ture content and place them in relatively small chambers, each with 

 a solution of different concentration from the other-, and in the 

 case in which there was no transfer from the soil to the solution or 

 viee versa equilibrium would exist and the osmotic pressure of the 

 soil water could be directly calculated from the known concentration 

 of the solution. 



In practice, however, it is far more feasible to place the soil -ample 

 of known moisture content in the vapor of a solution of approxir 

 mately the same osmotic pressure, let the .wo come int.. equilibrium 

 through vapor transfers, then compute the moisture content 

 the soil, the osmotic pressure of the solution, and the approximate 

 osmotic pressure of the soil «»n the assumption that the 



original 



