SALMON. 23 



I received a very obliging answer from that gentleman, 

 the purport of which was to say, that as his bill had 

 foiled, it was not necessary to trouble me any forther on 

 the subject. 



This letter contains evidence that Sir David Brew- 

 ster's experiments were made previously to its being 

 written ; and when I had thought of publishing, being 

 desirous to know the exact time Avhen they were made, 

 I wrote to Sir David to call liis attention to the subject. 

 His answer, dated 16th of April, 1840, was as follows : 



" I am pretty sure that my experiments on the struc- 

 ture of the crystalline lens of the Parr, which is iden- 

 tical with that of the Salmon, were made previous to 

 1828.* I remember well your stating to me that when 

 the silver scales of the young Salmon (which in Rox- 

 burghshire we call Smouts) were carefully rubbed off, 

 the colours of a dai-ker hue which characterise the Parr 

 were invariably and distinctly seen. I think you showed 

 me the experiments, but I am not sure of this. With 

 the view of confirming this your theory, or of over- 

 turning it, I mentioned to you that the fibres of the 

 lens of the salmon," &c. 



Then foUows the account of liis experiments, as de- 

 tailed a little farther on. 



Besides the reasons mentioned in the above letter, 

 there were other causes which influenced me in the 

 opinion I had formed ; the two principal of Avhicli were — 



* The date of Mr. Kennedy's Bill, wMch I have hut just ascer- 

 tained, \)vo\eii that thoy were made iu or before the year 1825; 

 whereas Mr. Shaw's fn-st account of his interesting experiments 

 appeared in the " Xew Edinburgh and Philosophical Journal " for 

 1836, vol. xxi. p. 99. — eleven years after. 



C 4 



