REFERENCES AND QUOTx\TIONS. 327 



any scientific discussion, on finding that the pedigree of the Verte- 

 brata, and therewith of man, is actually traced beyond the verte- 

 brated animals to so low a being as the Ascidians. It is otherwise 

 with the critics of Kowalewsky's and Kupffer's observations, who 

 acknowledge the facts, but think themselves obliged to differ in 

 their interpretation. One of these is A. Giard, in his work on 

 the " Embryogenie des Ascidiens." (Archive de Zoologie experi- 

 mentale, Paris, 1872.) The pupil of Lacaze Duthiers says : — "La 

 chorde et I'appendice caudale sont chez la larve Ascidienne des 

 organes de locomotion d'un importance assez secondaire malgr^ 

 leur g€Tv€x2X\X.€, pour qii^07i les voie disparaitre presqiie enticrement 

 dans le genre Molguia, ou ils sont devenus inutiles par suite des 

 mceurs de I'animal adulte ; I'homologie entre cette chorde dorsale 

 et celle des vertebres n'est done qu'une honiologie d^adaptatio7t 

 determinee a remplir I'iodentite des fonctions, et n'indique pas de 

 rapports de parente immediate entre les vertebres et les Ascidiens." 

 The author thus denies the consanguinity of the vertebrate animals 

 and Ascidians, and traces back to adaptation the resemblance 

 approaching identity occurring in the organs of the two. The 

 inferences in these few sentences appear to us utterly at fault. 

 The circumstance that in Molguia, and many other Testacea, de- 

 velopment takes a narrower course, makes as little alteration in the 

 importance of the facts as, for instance, the Nauplius development 

 of the Peneus observed by Fritz Miilier, or the Navicula of the 

 Molluscs, is prejudiced by the fact that the other Decapods have 

 forfeited the Nauplius phase, or the Landsnails the navicula phase. 

 But it is simply incomprehensible in what the identity of functions 

 is to consist which in the Vertebrata was capable of producing 

 the notochord, with, it is particularly to be remarked, the spinal 

 cord (which M. Giard entirely forgets) ; and, in the other case, 

 the " homologie d'adaptation." We, on the contrary, see these 

 organs performing different functions, because in the one they 

 remain of fundamental importance through life, and not in the 

 other. Thus we conversely lay the stress on the morphological 

 identity accompanying functional difference. M. Giard adduces 

 no facts. 



7*^ T. H. Huxley, Manual of the Anatomy of the Vcrtebrated 

 Animals. German Ed. 



