Literatur. 815 



Willianisoiif W. C, 1849. On the scaly heads or collars from ßunswick Bay, supposed 

 to belang to Zamia gigas. Proc. Roy. Soc, Part I, 1, p. 45 — 51. 



— 1S70. Contributions towards the History of Zamia gigas Lindl. and Button. Trans. 



Linn. Soc. London, 26, p. 663 — 674. 

 Worsdell, W. C, 1896. The anatomy of the stem of Macrozamia compared with that of 

 other genera of Cycadeae. AnnnU of Botany, 10, p. 601 — 620. 



— 1897. On Transfusion Tissue. Its origin and function in the leaves of Gymnospermout 



plants. Trans. Linn. Soc. London, Bot., 3, p. 301 — 319. 



— 1898. The vascular structure of the sporophylls of Cycadaceae. Ann. of Botany, 12, 



p. 203—241. 



— 1898. The comparative anatomy of certain genera of the Cycadaceae. Joum. Linn, 



Soc. Lxyndon, Botany, 33, p. 4^7 — 457. 



— 1900. The anatomical structure of Botcenia spectaMlis Hook. Annais of Botany, 14, 



p. 317—318. 



— 1900. The afßnities of the Mesozoic Fossil, Bennettites Gibsoniamts Carr. Annais of 



Botany, 14,' p. 717—721. 



Sechsund vierzigste Vorlesung. Die Polyciliaten. Tl. Die Cordaitales and Giiikgoales. 



a) Cordaitales. 



Flahault, Ch., 1893. La Paleobotanique, Paris 1893. 



Grand' Etu^y, C, 1877. Flore carbonifere du departement de la Loire et du centre de 



la France, 1877. 

 Benault, B., 1879. Structure comparee de quelques tiges de la flore carbonifere. Nouv. 



Arch. dv Museum d'hist. natur., Ser. II, 2, 1879. 

 Scott, D. H.f 1908. Studies in Fossil Botany, 2. edition. 



Solnis- Laubach, JB., C^raf zu, 1897. Einleitung in die Paläophytologie, Leipzig 1887. 

 Stopes, M. C, 1903. On the Leaf-stntcture of Cordaites. Xew Phytologist, 2, p. 91. 

 Zeiller, It., 1907. Les Progres de la Paleobotanique de l'ere des Gymnosperm^s. Progressus 



Bei Botanicae, 2, p. 171—226. 



b) Ginkg'oales. 



Carr lere, E. A., 1867. Tratte general des Coniferes, Paris 1887. 



Engler, A. , 1897. In Engler und PranÜ, Natürliche Pßamenfamilien. Nachträge zu 



Teil II— IV, p. 19. 

 Fatikhauser, J,, 1882. Entwicklung des Stengels und Blattes von Ginkgo, Bern 1882. 

 Ftijii, K., 1896. On the different views hitherto proposed regarding the morphology of the 



Floicers of Ginkgo biloba L. Bot. Mag. Tokyo, 10, p. 7. 

 Gouan, 1812. Description du Ginkgo biloba dit noyer du Japan, Montpellier 1812. 

 Heer, O., 1881. Zur Geschichte der Ginkgo-artigen Bäume. Englers Bot. Jahrb., 1. 

 Hirase, S.,^ 1894. The fecondation period of Ginkgo. Bot. Mag. Tokyo. 



— 1895. Etudes sur la fecondation et l'embryogenie du Ginkgo biloba. Joum. Coli. Sc. 



Imp. Univ. Japan, 8. 



— 1897. Untersuchungen über das Verhalten des Pollens von Ginkgo biloba. Bot. Centralbl., 



49, p. 33. 



— 1898. Etudes sur la fecondation et l'embryogenie du Ginkgo biloba. Joum. Coli. Sc. 



Japan, 12, p. WS. 

 Nakainura, Y., 1883. Ueber den anatomischen Bau des Holzes der vnchtigsten japanischen 



Coniferen. Unters. Forst.-Bot. Institut München, 3. 

 Mathe, F., 1887. Notes on some Australian Fossils. I. Salisburia palmata. Proc. Linn. 



Soc. N. S. Wales, 2, p. 136. 

 Sexcard, A. C, and Gouran, J., 1900. The Maidenhair Tree (Ginkgo biloba L.J. Ann. 



of Botany, 14, p. 109 — 153. 

 Smith, «J. E., 1797. Characters of a new Genus of Plants named Salisburia. Trans. Linn. 



Soc, 3, p. SSO. 

 V. Spiess, K., 1902. Ginkgo, Cephalotaxus und die Taxaceae. Oesterr. bot. Zeitschr., 1902. 

 Thibout, E., 1896. Recherches sur l'appareil male des Gymnospermes, Lille 1896. These. 

 Webber, H. J., 1897. Notes on the fecundation of Zamia and the PoUentube apparatus 



of Ginkgo. 

 V. Wettstein, R., 1899. Die weibliche Blüte von Ginkgo. Oesterr. bot. Zeitschr., 1899. 



