HORTUS MALABARICUS. 



VOL. VII. 



Tab. 1 Anamirta Cocculus. W. fy A. Cocculus suberosus of DC. 

 W.fyA. Cissampelos Cocculus. Poiret. Menisper- 

 muin Cocculus. Lin. 



Though Roxburgh has not quoted this very indifferent figure for either, it may 

 be doubted Avhether his M. Cocculus is more than a younger plant or variety 

 of his M. heteroclitum ; and Colebrook's description of Anamirta paniculata 

 (i. e. A. Cocculus of W. & A.), is taken almost verbatim from the description 

 of the latter in the Flora Indica. See Lin. Trans, xiii. p. 66. 



2. Cansjera Rheedii of Gmelin. R.fyS. C. malabarica. Lam. 



C. scandens Var. Roxb. Daphne polystachia. Willd. 



3. Cocculus acuminatus. W.fyA. C. radiatus. D C. Meni- 



spermum radiatum. Lam. M. glabrum of Konig. Per- 

 soon. Braunea menispermoides. Willd. 



Wight and Arnott consider the Tiliacora racemosa of Colebrook to be the same 

 species, and it appears from his MS. that Dr. Hamilton was disposed to re- 

 move it from Cocculus with the generical name of Natsiatura. 



4. Cansjera scandens. Roxb. C. malabarica Var. Lam. C. 



Rheedii Var. R Sf S. Daphne monostachya. Willd. 

 Tab. 2 is the C. malabarica of Lamarck, and he has called this plant a variety 

 ' racemulis solitariis.' 



5. Strychnos minor. Denn. 



Quoted by Linnaeus and several other writers for S. Colubrina, but in many re- 

 spects it answers better to the description of S.potatorum, and Dennstedt's 

 authority for arranging it as a species otherwise undescribed than by Rheede, 

 is very doubtful. See note on vol. viii., t. 24. 



6. Vitis indica. Lin. 



Hamilton considered this, instead of tab. 7, to be the V. latifolia of Roxburgh, 

 but it is quoted by Roxburgh himself for V. indica, and answers better both 

 to the description and specimens of the latter. 



7. Vitis erioclada. W.fyA. 



Misquoted by Roxburgh for his V. latifolia, and by Dennstedt with a query for 

 Vitis (i. e. Cissus) viliginea of Linnaeus. In the fourth line of Rheede's De- 

 scription, it is the opinion of Drs. Wight and Arnott that ' viscosus' is a mis- 

 print for < villosus,' See Prod. Fl, Ind, Orien, f , 130. 



