46 HORT. MAL. VOL. IX. 



Tab. 63. Aneilema nudicaulis. R. Brown. Tradescantiamalabarica. 

 Lin. Coramelina nudicaulis of Burman. 



Quoted by Burman both for T. malabaric.fi, and erroneously for the Linnean 

 C. nudiflora, instead of his own C. nudicaulis. It is quoted in the Hortus 

 Britannicus for C. nudicaulis, and again for T. malabarica, and errroneously by 

 Roxburgh for C. nudiflora. Rheede appears to have confounded the nectaries 

 with the filaments, and has described this species to be pentandrous ; and vol. x. 

 tab. 19, to which it is very neary allied, is described with six stamens. 



64. 



Quoted by Linnaeus, Burman, Willdenow, Aiton, Roxburgh, and most other 

 authors for Ruellia ringens (i. e., Hygrophila ringens of Brown), but Roxburgh 

 says that the divisions of the border of the corol are too long and too sharp,' 

 and Mr. Brown has pronounced it to be altogether a different plant, nor have 

 I met with any other reference to this figure. 



65. Sonerila maculata. Roxb. Cassebeeria maculata. Denn. 

 Arranged separately from S. maculata by Wight and Arnott with the name of 



S, Rheedii. 



66. Buchnera-asiatica of Lin. Roxb. 



If intended for B. asiatica, this figure is far from correct, and by Dennstedt it is 

 quoted with a query for the Lobelia pubescens of Aiton. 



67. Polygala crotalarioides of DC. ? 



In Dr. Hamilton's MS. it is suggested that this may be Polygala telephoides of 

 Willdenow, but it answers better in the opinion both of Mr. Don and myself 

 to a specimen which in Roxburgh's Herbarium has been marked P. crota- 

 larioides. By an obviously typographical error, Willdenow has quoted tab. 67 

 instead of tab. 36, for Indigofera gldbra, and so Dennstedt has given that name 

 to this plate. 



68. Centranthera hispida.? Wallich. Capraria rigida. 



Ham. MS. Purshia ciliata. Denn. 



Quoted by Roxburgh for his Torenia cordifolta, and is more likely to be a va- 

 riety of his Digitalis stricta, i. e. Centranthera hitpida of Wallich, but does not 

 well accord with either. The genus Purshia of Dennstedt and of all other 

 authors must be very different. 



69. Justicia nasuta. Lin. Rhinacanthus communis. N. Esen. 



70. Utricularia reticulata. Smith. 



Misquoted for U.ceerulea by Linnaeus and most other authors. 



71. Xyris indica. Lin. 



72. Gomphrena hispida. Lin. 



73. Riedleia corchori folia. W. fy A. Melochia corchorifolia. 



Lin. 



As remarked by Dr. Roxburgh it is far from a good figure. 



74. Coleus aromaticus of Bentham. 



Rheede has not noticed either the flower or the fruit, but Rumphius considered 

 it to be the same as his vol. v. t. 102, f. 2, which is Coleus aromaticus. 



