20 THE GENUS ODOB^NUS. 



the characters assigned by Fremery as distinctive of several 

 species, and after mentioning at length other features of varia- 

 tion observed by him in a considerable series of skulls, describ- 

 ing several of his specimens in detail, and arriving at the con- 

 clusion that up to that time aU the supposed species of Walrus 

 constituted really but a single species, added another, under 

 the appropriate name Trichechus duMus. This with subsequent 

 authors has shared the fate of Fremery's species,* being consid- 

 ered as based merely on individual variation. 



As will be more fuUy noticed later, two nominal species have 

 been founded on the fossil remains of the Walrus, namely, Tri- 

 cliechus mrginiamis, DeKay, 1842, and Odobenotherium larte- 

 tianum of Gratiolet, the former based on remains from Accomac 

 County, Virginia, and the latter on remains from near Paris, 

 France. Lankester, in 1865, added stiU another, based on 

 tusks from the Eed Crag of England, under the name Triclie- 

 cliodon Imxleyi. 



Dr. Leidy, in 1860, in a paper on fossil remains of the Wal- 

 rus from the eastern coast of the United States, again noticed 

 the differences in the size, length, and curvature of the tusks 

 in specimens from the northwest coast of North America and 

 the common Walrus of the ISTorth Atlantic. He says : "In the 

 course of the i^receding investigations [referring to previous 

 portions of his paper], I was led to examine a specimen, in the 

 cabinet of the Academy of Natural Sciences [of Philadelphia], 

 consisting of the stuffed skin of a portion of the head envelop- 

 ing the jaws of a species of Walrus apparently differing from 

 the true Triclieciis rosmarus^ of which, as characteristic, I have 

 viewed the figures of the skull and skeletons as given by Dau- 

 benton, Cuvier, and De Blainville. The specimen was pre- 

 sented by Sandwith Drinker, Esq., of Canton, China, and was 

 probably derived from the Asiatic shore of the Arctic Ocean. 

 From the worn condition of the upjjer incisor and molars, it 

 appears to have belonged to an old indi\ddual ; and in the case 

 of the lower jaw, the teeth appear to have been entirely worn 

 out. The tusks are very much larger and are narrower than in 



* Giebel, in 1855, referred to Freraery's and Stanuius's species as still need- 

 ing confirmation : " Die von Fremery nacli der Bescliaffenheit der Ziiluie 

 tuiterscMedenen Arten, Tr. longidens uixd. Tr. CooM; sind liingst als unhaltbar 

 erkannt worden und auch. die von Stannius anf Schadeldifferenzen begriin- 

 dete Art, Tr. dums, entbehrt nocli der weitern Bestiitigung." Saugethiere, 

 p. 128, footnote. 



