Part 516 - Exhibits 



516.17 



§516.17 Decision Table for conducting status reviews in 1991 only 

 (continued) . 



If the status 

 review indicates: 



and the situation 

 below exists: 



then the review 

 determination is: 



2. All planned 

 practices sche- 

 duled for applica- 

 tion prior to 

 status review 

 are applied, or the 

 person attempted to 

 apply all sched- 

 uled practices. 



2a. All practices meet 

 FOTG requirements. 



2b. One or more prac- 

 tices do not fully meet 

 FOTG requirements but 

 the applied practices 

 achieve 75 percent or 

 more of the erosion 

 reduction that would 

 have been achieved if 

 the applied practices 

 fully met FOTG require- 

 ments . 



2c. The applied prac- 

 tices achieve less than 

 75 percent of the eros- 

 ion reduction that 

 would have been ac- 

 hieved if the applied 

 practices fully met 

 FOTG requirements, but 

 the person indicates 

 that a special circxim- 

 stance or personal 

 hardship prevented 

 proper practice applic- 

 ation. 



2a. Actively applying the 

 conservation plan. Advise 

 producer of any improve- 

 ments that may be needed 

 to assure future 

 compliance. 



2b. A minor technical 

 variance to actively 

 applying the conservation 

 plan is granted for 1991, 

 and the producer is 

 expected to achieve at 

 least 85% of the erosion 

 reduction that is to be 

 achieved in the 1992 

 crop year. Schedule a 

 status review in 1992. 



2c. Make an initial deter- 

 mination of not actively 

 applying the conservation 

 plan and request state 

 conservationist approval 

 for variance. If variance 

 is granted, change deter- 

 mination to actively 

 applying and notify 

 producer. Producer is 

 expected to achieve at 

 least 85% of the erosion 

 reduction that is to be 

 achieved in the 1992 crop 

 year. Schedule a status 

 review in 1992. 



516-34 



(180-V-NFSAM, Second Ed., Amend. 6, May 1991) 



