While MDT has r.cc received Z?A granc funding previcusly, and 

 therefore can not respond to our ability to successfully complete 

 EPA grants, MDT can attest to the growth and commitnient cf our 

 wetlands aianagement program to this point. In the mid-1980's MDT 

 formed an interagency wetlands working group to provide for more 

 effective wetlands reviews and management relating to MDT 

 projects. Currently, this formal agreement is under revision and 

 may function as a prototype for an interagency group in t.he 

 statewide plan. MDT strives to provide progressive and pertinent 

 training and support for staff and programs, as demonstrated cy 

 sponsoring two weeks of wetland training for staff, state and 

 federal agencies, and private consultants. MDT's overall 

 commitment to environmental issues is increasing. The recant 

 elevation of the Environmental Section to the Environmental and 

 Hazardous Wastes Bureau and doubling of staff reflects t.his 

 evolution. MDT's intentions, both in policy and on t.he ground, 

 are to manage, mitigate, and conserve wetlands to our best 

 abilities. To do this, we need assistance, both monetarily and 

 technically, to improve cur current program. 



MDT proposes a five task plan that would help alleviate 

 factors impeding MDT's program, contribute to a statewide r 

 wetlands plan, and assist other agencies in wetland management. 

 .^n outline of the five tasks, associated work activities, 

 outcomes, and estimated budget follows. 



