Quality Assurance 



Se\'eral steps were taken to assure that the study results are accurate and reproducible. 

 Upon receipt of the samples, station and sample attribute data were recorded in the Montana 

 Diatom Database and the samples were assigned a unique number, e.g., 2960-01 . The first part 

 of this number (2960) designates the sampling site (Doolittle Creek below North Fork) and the 

 second part (01) designates the number of periphyton samples that that have been collected at 

 this site for which data have been entered into the Montana Diatom Database. 



Sample observations and analyses of soft (non-diatom) algae were recorded in a lab 

 notebook along with information on the sample label. A portion of the raw sample was used to 

 make duplicate diatom slides. The slides used for the diatom proportional counts will be 

 deposited in the Montana Diatom Collection at the University of Montana Herbarium (MONTU) 

 in Missoula. Duplicate slides will be retained by Hannaea in Helena. Diatom proportional 

 counts have been entered into the Montana Diatom Database. 



Results and Discussion 



Results are presented in Tables 3, 4, 5, and 6 which are located near the end of this report 

 following the references section. Appendix A contains a diatom report for each sample. Each 

 diatom report includes an alphabetical list of diatom species in that sample and their percent 

 abundances, and values for 65 different diatom metrics and ecological attributes. 



Sample Notes (Table 3) 



Notes on the contents and condition of each sample are recorded in Table 3. Most 

 samples contained varying amounts of sediment and plant material other than algae. 



• 



Non-Diatom Algae (Table 4) 



