METHODS 



Periphyton samples were collected following standard 

 operating procedures of the MDEQ Planning, Prevention, and 

 Assistance Division. Using appropriate tools, microalgae were 

 scraped, brushed, or sucked from natural substrates in proportion 

 to the rank of those substrates at the study site. Macroalgae 

 were picked by hand in proportion to their abundance at the site. 

 All collections of microalgae and macroalgae were pooled into a 

 common container and preserved with Lugol ' s solution. 



Samples were examined to estimate the relative abundance and 

 rank by biovolume of diatoms and genera of soft (non-diatom) 

 algae according to the method described in Bahls (1993) . Soft 

 algae were identified using Prescott (1978) , Smith (1950) , and 

 Whitford and Schumacher (1984) . These books also served as the 

 main references on the ecology of the soft algae. 



After the identification of soft algae, raw periphyton 

 samples were cleaned of organic matter using sulfuric acid, and 

 permanent diatom slides were prepared in a high refractive index 

 mounting medium following Standard Methods for the Examination of 

 Water and Wastewater (APHA 1998) . For each slide, between 400 

 and 500 diatom cells (800 to 1,000 valves) were counted at random 

 and identified to species. The following were used as the main 

 taxonomic and autecological references: Krammer and Lange- 

 Bertalot 1986, 1988, 1991a, 1991b; Patrick and Reimer 1966, 1975. 



The diatom proportional counts were used to generate an 

 array of diatom association metrics (Table 2) . A metric is a 

 characteristic of the biota that changes in some predictable way 

 with increased human influence (Barbour et al . 1999). 



One additional metric was calculated for this study: 



5 



