NO. 1105. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM. 151 



E. Blanchard in 1891 admitted the following species to tins genus: 



A.perfollata 1 (Goeze, 1782). 

 A. mamillana (Mehlis, 1831). 

 A. plicata (Zeder, 1800). 

 A. transversaria (Krabbe, 1879). 

 A. ivimerosa (Moniez, 1880). 

 A. globiceps 2 (Diesing, 1856). 



A. blanchardi, Moniez, 1891. 



.1. zebrce (Rudolphi, 1810). 



A. hijracis (Rudolphi, 1810). 



A. gifjantea (Peters, 1856). 



Tcenia rhopaloeephala, Riehui, 1881. 



T. rhopaliocephala, Riehm, 1881. 



Two of these species, Tcenia rhopaloeephala and T. rhopaliocephala, 

 I refer with Railliet to the genus Andrya (vide, p. 154). Of the 

 other species, A. wimerosa is the only one which occurs in rabbits. 

 This form is very closely allied to A. mamillana of the horse and 

 A. transversaria of the marmot, which are here introduced for com- 

 parison. Several of the remaining forms require further study before 

 their generic position can be looked upon as fully established. Setti 

 (1893) refers Arhynchotwnia critica Pagenstecher, 1877, and Tcenia 

 ragazzii Setti, 1891, from Hyrax to this genus. 



ANOPLOCEPHALA WIMEROSA (Moniez, 1880), R. Blanchard, 1891. 



(Plato V, figs. 1-7.) 



1880, 3 Tcenia wimerosa, MONIEZ, Bull, scientif. du Depart, dn Nord, 2 ser., 3 ann., no. 6, 



Juin, pp. 240-242. 

 1891, Anoplocephala ivimerosa (MONIEZ, 1880), R. BLANCHARD, Mem. Soc. zool. France, 



IV, p. 187, p. 449. 

 1893, Andrya wimerosa (MoNiE/, 1880), RAILLIET, Traite" de Zool. med. et agric., I, p. 



283. 



Moniez, in 1880, described as T. wimerosa a cestode which he found 

 in Lepus cunlculus at Wimereux. His description reads as follows : 



[p. 241.] Le Tcenia Wimerosa appartient au type du Tccnia expansa. Observe" a, Trail 

 mi ou sous de faibles grossissements, cette espece qui atteint a peine un centimetre de 

 long sur une largeur de un millimetre et demi, se pre"sente avec un corps e"pais, forme" 

 d'une dizaine d'anneaux seulemeut. La tete est grosse, les ventouses 6cartees, il 

 n'y a ni bulbe ni crochets, le con est nul. Les anneaux s'accusent d'abord par des 

 plis accentues; leur rebord inf<5rieur tres saillant est arrondi et orn6 d'une serie de 

 cils 616gamment disposes; leur aspect rappelle celui des cils des ventouses dont j'ai 

 parle" ailleurs a propos de la Ligule. 



L'appareil genital n'est pas double dans cette espece comme cLez beaucoup 

 d'Inermes et, par une autre particularity tous les anneaux le portent du ineme cote. 

 En meme temps, 1'ouverture gcnitale d^bouche au rebord infdrieur de Tanneau, bien 



1 The tapeworms of the horse should be subjected to an anatomical revision, and at 

 the same time their specific names should be correctly established. I refrain from 

 attempting to straighten out these names at present, as this can be done satis- 

 factorily only when one has a good line of specimens before him. The tapeworms 

 of horses are unfortunately very poorly represented in the Bureau of Animal Indus- 

 try collection. 



2 Llihe, 1895 B, pp. 202-205, has recently reexamined Diesing's type material of this 

 species, and has shown it to be an unquestionable Anoplocephala. 



3 The citations immediately following the specific names include only those articles 

 which have a direct bearing on the synonymy s. st. ; other references are cited in the 

 text by date of publication. (See Bibliography, p. 222.) 



