102 



AGRICULTURAL APPROPRIATION BILL, ll>2-t. 



Mv. AxDERSox. .Will you ^rive us a statement showinfr the allotment 

 of this fund to the States and the sums spent in the States by the 

 States themselves and other afrencies? 



Doctor MoiiLER. Yes, sir. I have a statement of that kind. 



(The table referred to and submitted bj" Doctor Mohler is here 

 printed in full as follows:) 



Indemnity funds for tuberculosis eradication. 



Expenditures, fiscal year 

 1922. 



Federal. 



State. 



Allotment of 



Federal 



funds for 



1923. 



Alaska 



ArlKona 



Colorado 



Connecticut. 



Delaware 



Florida 



Hawaii 



Idaho 



Illinois 



Indiana 



Iowa 



Kansas 



Kentucky. 

 Maine 



Maryland 



Massachusetts . . . 



MichiRan 



Minnesota 



Mississippi 



Missoun 



Montana 



Nebraska 



Nevada 



New Hampshire. 



New .lersey 



New Mexico 



New York 



North Carolina. . 

 North Dakota... 

 Ohio. 



Oklahoma 



Oregon 



Pennsylvania. . . 

 Rhode Island... 

 South Carolina. 

 South Dakota. . 



Tennessee 



Texas 



Utah 



Vermont 



Virginia 



Washington 



West Virginia. . 



AVisconsin 



Wyoming 



$6a5.42 



Total. 



1,416.13 



46. 999. 91 

 20, 820. 78 



1,3.51.79 

 2,001.38 

 8,097.iJ9 



74. 198. 34 

 68, 29.i. 70 



1:^6,141.11 



19, 3H(). 68 



17,341.17 



20. 669. % 



37, 15.**. 30 



972. 37 



102, 306. 09 



29.929.15 



2,181,20 



42. 205. 92 

 16, 15.5. 31 



70. 022. 35 

 7.077.98 



28,012.25 

 39,223.6s 



1,201.33 

 ■224,782.34 

 10, 479. 06 

 14,848.69 

 41,693.79 

 11,020.-54 

 16,53S.93 

 13,263.60 



3.176.98 



3, 407. .56 

 16,017,73 



2,086,06 

 16, 158. 81 



6, 175. 88 

 91,871.03 

 16 410.76 

 32,7,12.27 



9,627.08 

 117,567.27 



3,638.58 



1,445,262.85 



$l,3.^5. 13 



1,416.13 

 92, 289. 81 

 36.923.53 



2,75.5. lii 

 10, 426. .57 



8, 097. .59 

 74, 198. 34 

 80, 793. 30 

 157,134.29 

 43,881.22 

 44,426.86 

 57, 827. 81 

 37. 158. 30 



2. 525. 00 



213.204.47 



59.415.15 



4,054.94 

 42.2a5.92 

 39,483.18 

 70,021.91 

 11,772.65 

 53.2:«. 15 

 69,862.46 



1,201.33 

 532.009.66 

 10,479.06 

 14,848.69 

 41,694.20 

 20, 139. 13 

 16, .541. 23 

 20,030.17 



6,416.65 



3,407.56 

 27,719.67 



4,391.67 

 16,259.58 



6. 175. 88 

 91,871.2;? 

 21,422.73 

 .32,732.30 

 19,, 372. 15 

 121,573.31 



3.083.03 



2,226,711.09 



$3,000.00 



5,000.00 



4,800.00 



50,000.00 



24,000.00 



2.500.00 



5.000.00 



12,000.00 



100,000.00 



80,000.00 



150,000.00 



24,000.00 



20, 000. (to 



22.00(1. iHV 



60, 000. 00 



4(1, 000. 00 



120, aw. 00 



50,000.00 

 3,000.00 

 50,000.00 

 •25,000.00 

 85, 000. 00 



10, 000. a> 



40,000.00 



40,000.00 



2,000.00 



280,00a00 

 20,000.00 

 25,000.00 

 50,000.00 

 30,000.00 

 2.5,000.00 



100,000,00 

 10,000,00 



4,5oaoo 



24,000.00 



2,000.00 



27,000.00 



12,000.00 



100,000.00 

 17,000.00 

 40,000.00 

 12,000.00 



120,000,00 



6,ooaoo 



1,031,800.00 



KUNU.S KOIi OrKK.VriNci KXPF.N.SKS. 



JVIr. A>M)EHS()X. How is tlie jiroportioii of the juovision between 

 operatin<r expenses and indeiiiuitv staii(liii<r up so far this year^ 



Doctor MoHi-EH. The funds for operating; expenses are ^oinj: 

 rather fa.st. We have finished one-third of the year, and if we 

 ke))t up at the same rate we have been ^oin*; we would have a 

 deficit of $9(),0()(). So what is happening; is that we are now start - 

 in<r to decrease our forces in order to consi'rve the funds. Other- 

 wise they would be exhausted in May if we kept on workin^: at 

 Uie same rate we have been going. 



