112 BACTERIA IN MILK 



bacterial count may vary slightly; the direction of this varia- 

 tion will depend upon the condition of the milk when sampled, 

 low counts tending to decrease and high counts to become still 

 Jiigher, thus leaving the general significance unaltered. 



BIBLIOGRAPHY 



1. Bailey and Hall. Centralbl. f. Bakt. 1895, Abt. 2, 793. 



2. Ward. Bull. 178, Cornell Expt. Sta. 1898. 



3. Henderson. J. Roy. San. Inst. 1904, 25, 563. 



4. Sedgwick and Batchelder. Boston Med. Jour. 1892, 126, 25. 



5. Park. Jour, of Hyg. 1901, 1, 391. 



6. McConkey. Jour, of Hyg. 1906, 6, 385. 



7. Von Freudenreich. ' Centralbl. f. Bakt. 1901, Abt. 2, 8, 674. 



8. Von Freudenreich and Thoni. Centralbl. f. Bakt. 1903, Abt. 2, 



10, 305. 



9. Von Freudenreich. Centralbl. f. Bakt. 1903, 401. 



10. Bergy. Bull. 125, Penn. Dept. of Agr. 1904. 



11. Savage. Milk and Public Health. London, 1915, p. 19. 



12. Stocking. Rpt. Storr's Expt. Agr. Sta. 1906, Bull. 42. 



13. Backhaus. Molkerei Zeit., 1898, No. 4. 



14. Harrison. Rpt. Ontario Agr. Dept. 1896, 109-113. 



15. Orr. Rpt. on Milk Contamination, 1908. 



16. Savage. Bact. Examination of Water Supplies. London, 1906, p. 35 



17. Park. Jour, of Hyg. 1901, 1, 398. 



18. Rosenau. U. S. A. Pub. Health and Marine Hosp. Service, Hyg. 



Lab. Bull. 56. 



19. St. John and Pennington. Jour. Inf. Dis., 1907, 4, 647. 



20. Stocking. Storr's Expt. Agr. Sta. Bull. 28, 1904. 



21. Ayres and Johnson. U. S. A. Dept. of Agr., Bull. 126. 1910. 



22. Conn and Esten. , Rpt. Storrs Expt. Agr. Sta. 1904, 27. 



23. Ravenal, Hastings, and Hammer. Jour. Inf. Dis., 1910, 7, 38. 



24. Pennington. J. of Bio. Chem. 1908, 4, 353. 



