ECHINODERMATA 401 



enterocoeles — should be confirmed. This would indicate an approach 

 to segmented forms. But in this connection one is involuntarily re- 

 minded of the condition of the larva of Balanoglossm, in which, according 

 to Bateson, an internal segmentation is expressed by the establishment 

 of three pairs of coelomic sacs (comp. Fig. 167, p. 380). Even in its 

 external shape the Tornaria of Bahinoglossus seems to possess a certain 

 resemblance to the Echinoderm larvae. Added to this is the fact that 

 the so-called water-vascular vesicle of Balanoglossus may exhibit a bipar- 

 tite fundament. Also the water-vascular vesicle of the Echinoderms in 

 certain cases (especially in the Ophiuroidea, and occasionally in the 

 Asteroidea) is said to be begun as a paired structure (Metschnikoff). 

 Should this statement (hitherto held to be insufficiently authenticated) 

 be confirmed, then one would be able to compare the fundament of this 

 system of organs — so important for the Echinoderms, but so obscure as 

 regards its phylogenetic origin — with an embryonal excretory apparatus 

 (primitive kidney). This view is supported by the discoveries of P. und 

 F. Sarasin (No. 47), who explain the glandular structure, which opens to 

 the exterior at the same time as the stone canal — the so-called heart of 

 the sea-urchin — as an excretory organ communicating freely with the 

 body cavity by means of an open ciliated funnel. The assumption of 

 the Sarasins that the excretory system is the more primitive, and the 

 water-vascular system, with its locomotor function, is only an organ 

 derived from it, seems to be one that is required by the natural course of 

 events. 



Literature. 



1. Agassiz, a. Embryology of the Starfish. Cambridge. 1864. Also 



as Mem. Mus. Comp. Zool. Harvard Coll. Vol. v. 1877. 



2. Agassiz, A. On the Embryology of Echinoderms. Mem. Amer. 



Acad. Arts and Sciences. Vol. ix. 1867. 



3. Agassiz, A. Kevision of the Echini. Illustr. Cat. No. 7 { = Mem. 



vol. iii.) Mus. Comp. Zool. Harvard Coll. 1872-1874. 



4. Agassiz, A. On Viviparous Echini from the Kerguelen Islands. 



Proc. Amer. Acad. Arts and Sciences. Vol. iii. 1876. 



5. Apostolides, N. C. Sur I'anatomie et le d^veloppement des Ophi- 



ures. Arch. Zool. exper. et gen. Tom. x. 1881. 



6. Barrois, J. Eecherches sur le developpement de la Comatule (C. 



Mediterranea). Becueil Zool. Suisse. Tom. iv. 1888. 



7. Bury, H. The Early Stages in the Development of Antedon rosacea. 



Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London. Vol. clxxix. 1888. 



8. Bury, H. Studies in the -Embryology of Echinoderms. Quart. 



Jour. Micr. Sci. Vol. xxix. 1889. 



9. Carpenter, P. H. On Some Points in the Anatomy of Larval 



Comatulffi. Quart. Jour. Micr. Sci. Vol. xxiv. 1884. 

 10. Carpenter, W. B. Kesearches on the Structure, Physiology, and 

 Development of Antedon rosacea (Com. Mediterran.). Phil. 



