Appendix C Chronology of Events in Marbled Murrelet 

 Conservation Assessment 



August 1992 

 September 1992 



October 1992 

 November 1992 

 December 1992 



January 1993 

 February 1993 



March 1993 



April 1993 



May 1993 



May-August 1993 



June 1993 

 July-November 1993 



December 1993 

 January 1994 



February 1994 



March 1994 



March-April 1994 



April 1994 



May 1994 



June 1994 



August-September 1994 



October 1994 



February 1995 



1 Appointment of Team Leader and working outline of Conservation Assessment prepared. 



Species is listed as 'Threatened' by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for Washington, 

 Oregon, and California. 



1 Recruitment of Technical Working Group 



1 Naming of Core Team to compile a draft report and prepare a final report. 



1 Funding for Conservation Assessment approved by USDA Forest Service 

 1 Workshop of Technical Working Group held in Arcata, California. 



1 Establishment of Conservation Assessment Center in Arcata. 



Meeting of Technical Working Group during Pacific Seabird Group Meeting in Seattle, 

 Washington. 



Meeting of Technical Working Group in Arcata 



Core team meets in Arcata to determine any general analyses. 



1 All data pertinent to the Assessment was collated in Arcata where a group of technicians 

 assembled and dispersed data to authors. 



1 This period was used to direct existing, previously-funded programs in augmenting their data 

 sets, in analysis of existing data, and compilation of incoming data at Arcata. The second 

 working session considered reviews of the first draft and, as appropriate, suggested revisions 

 and reanalysis. 



Charter drafted and approved. 

 1 Chapters assigned to authors. 



Chapters undergo extensive internal and peer review by core team and reviewers selected 

 by authors. 



Draft of complete Assessment sent out for outside review 



Meeting of Technical Working Group to discuss chapters and possible additions at Pacific 

 Seabird Meeting in Sacramento, California. 



1 Revisions received from authors 



Review by outside, scientific societies begun. 



Continued review from peers of each chapter, and revisions received from authors. 



Reviews from scientific societies received. 



The comments from outside reviewers, selected by the Core Team, received and distributed 

 to authors. 



1 Final drafts received from authors. 



Core Team meets and reviews all manuscripts and drafts overview chapter. 



1 Core Team's comments to authors for preparation of final, electronic document. 



1 Manuscripts submitted to Station editors. 



1 Final typescripts from Station editors to authors for approval of editorial changes. 



1 Final typescripts to Station for layout and production. 



Publication. 



420 



USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-152. 1995. 



