id. "Pliilanipc'lns Siitelliliii, lig. 5." 



The species is now more correctly known us Philumpclu!? paudorus 

 {Iliihier). 



id. " Undescribed ? lig. G." 



Tlie figure represents a Geometrid, unidentified by us. 



id. "Undescribed? fig. 7" 

 The figure probiibly represents Lithacodes fasciola {II.-S.). 



id. "L^ndescribed? fig. 8." 



The figure probably represents Eustrotia synochitis {G. <£• IL). 



id. " Bombyx ? (undescribed), fig. 9." 



Tlic figure represents the male Cressonia juglandis {Abh. £ Sin.). 



id. "Agrotis , fig. 10." 



Perhaps the figure represents Agrotis tessellata Harris. 



id. " Agrotis , fig. 11.'* 



The figure represents Agrotis sutfusa ( W. V.). 



Plate 46. " Deiopeia bella, fig. 5." 



The determination is correct; the insect is now regarded as a form 

 of Utetheisa ornatrix {Linn.). 



id. "Undescribed? fig. G." 



The species represented is Angerona crocataria {Fair.). 



Plate 47. " Callimorpha parthenice, fig. 3." 



The insect represented is Arctia virgo (X.), with which Kirby's 

 species is probably synonymous. 



id. " Callimorpha virguncula, fig. 5." 



The insect figured is probably Arctia virguncula {Kirhy), although 

 the hind wings are erroneously colored. 



id. " Eudryas grata, fig. 8." 



This determination is correct. On this Plate outline figures are 

 given also of " Carpocapsa pomonella, fig. 4 " and " Adela Degeerella, 

 fig. 7." 



If, in 1854, the appreciation of the value of Entomology warranted 

 the publication of Dr. Emmons' volume, certainly its substitution 

 in 1874, by a more correct Avork, is demanded alike by the present 

 status of the Science and the honor of the State of New York. 



