Bibliography of tin- Ixodoidea. II ham -hir 



plasmosis in cattle; Fig. 4r>, /'. bovis (not original); Fig. 16, map 'jiving 

 distribution of B. annulatus in U. S. A.] 

 Hamerton, A. E., see Bruce, D. 

 Hanington, J. W. B., see Dutton, J. E. 

 Hart, G. H., see Mackellar, W. M. 

 Hauer, A. (1912), Untersuohungen iiber die Wirkung des Mittels 606 auf die 



HUhnerspirillose. Centralbl. f. /J"/.i., I. Abt., Orig. i.xn. 477 196. [\ r aluable 



summary of literature on fowl spirochaetosis with good bibliography.] 

 Hays, W. J. (1869), The moose tick. American Naturalist, n. 559, Fig. [Title 



communicated by J. G. Huber.] 

 Hazen, E. H (1871), Cattle tick in the human ear. American Naturalist, v. (Title 



communicated by J. C. Huber.] 

 Henry, M. (X. 1913), The Tick problem in New South Wales. Agric. Oaz., X. -V. II '.. 



Sydney, xxix. 829-837. Rev. in Rev. Applied Entomol., I., ser. I'., 232 233. 

 Henshaw, R W.,and Birdseye, C. (1911), The mammals of the Bitter Root Valley, 



Montana, in their relation to Spotted Fever. U. S. I >'■/>' t Agric., Bur. Biol. 



Surv., Circular 82, pp. 24, 12 Figs. 

 Herring, L. T. (III. 1911), Texas Tick Fever and Brahma Cattle. American Veter. 



Rev., N. Y., 1910-11, xxxviii. 756-761. Abstract in Journ. Trop. Veter. Set., 



Calcutta, vii. 135-136. [States pure breed and Brahma crossed with native 



cattle are less liable to tick infestation than native cattle, although they are 



susceptible to piroplasniosis in Texas.] 

 Hibbard, R. P., and Neal, D. C. (XI. 1911), Some observations on the blood of dairy 



cows in tick-infested regions. Journ. Infect. Diseases, ix. 324-342. [2\ > mention 



of the species of tick infesting the cattle.] 

 Hindle, E. (VI. 1911), The transmission of Spirochaeta duttoni. Parasitology, v. 



133-149. [Experiments carried out in Prof. NuttaJl's laboratory to determine 



the manner in which 0. moubata transmits spirochaetosis.] 



(X. 1911), The relapsing fever of Tropical Africa. Parasitology, IV. 183-2":;. 



2 Maps and 1 Chart. [A short summary. Brief mention of 0. moubata and 

 its relation to the disease. Map 1 shows geogr. distribution of the disease, 

 Map 2 (after Merriman) that of the tick.] 



(XII. 1911), On the life-cycle of Spirochaeta gallinarum. (Preliminary note.) 



Parasitology, iv. 463-477, 4 Figs, and 1 diagram. [Development of fowl 

 spirochaete in Argas persicus.] 



(read 29. I. 1912), The inheritance of spirochaetal infection in Argas persicus. 



Proc. Cambr. Philos. Soc, xvi. 457-459. 



(III. 1912), Attempts to transmit Fowl Pest by Argas persicus. Ilu'i 7. Soc. M4d. 



Exotique, Paris, v. 165-167. [Fowl-pest virus still potent after nine days, but 

 not after fourteen days, in the gut of A. persicus at 22-28° C. The virus does 

 not traverse the gut wall of the tick. The tick not a host for the parasite, and 

 incapable of conveying the disease.] 



see Nuttall, G. R F. 



Hindle, E., and Cunliffe, N. (13. I. 1914), Regeneration in Argas persicus. /'or<>- 



sitology, vi. 353-371, 4 Figs. 

 Hindle, E., and Merriman, G. (1912), The sensory perceptions of Argas persicus 



(Oken). Parasitology, v. 203-216. 

 Hirst, S. (VI. 1914), Report on the Arachnida and Myriapoda collected by the 



13 



