349 



Genus II. HAEMAPHYSALIS C. L. Koch, 1844. 

 Synonymy and Literature. 



The following refereuces only relate to publications which deal with the genus 

 or cognate matters. 



Ixodes 1827. Audouin, p. 428 (/. leachn = H. leacht). 1849. Gervais, p. 49 



(/. lagotis= Haemaphysalis ^).).- 1869. Packard, p. 67 (/. chordeilis = H. cinna- 



harina Koch ; /. leporu-palustris = H. leporis-palustris) . 1880. ]\regnin, p. 132 



(/. cheUfer=H. condnna Koch ^). See further under our list of condemned 

 species. 



Haemaphysalis 1844. Koch, p. 237 (genus first defined. Four species : 1 H. rosea, 

 2 einnabarina, 3 sanguiTiolenta, and 4 condnna, of which cinnaharina and 



condnna are good species). 1847. Koch, p. 25. 1877. Canestrini and 



Fanzago, p. 110 ; Murray, p. 19'J. 1890. Canestrini, pp. 483, 493. 1892. 



Canestrini, p. .581 ; Marx (a), p. 233, (6), p. 283 ; Trouessart, p. 47. 1895. 



Railliet, p. 714 (nothing original). 1897. Neumann, pp. 326, 358 (key for 



determination) ; Supino, pp. 241, 243.— — 1900. Ward («), p. 200 (nothing 



original). 1901. Salmon and Stiles, pp. 457-459, figs. 219-221 (from Neumann, 



1897 ; they give short generic diagnosis, synonymy, bibliography and transla- 

 tion of Neumann's key). 1905. Lahille, pp. 14, 15, 44, 154. 1906. Buy, 



p. 118 (generic characters tabulated) ; Wheler, p. 420. 1907. Donitz, pp. 15, 



67, 111 ; Hunter and Hooker, p. 52 (incomplete generic diagnosis) ; Pocock, 

 p. 190 (key to genera of ticks) ; Warburton (a), p. 92, pi. VII, fig. 2 (classifica- 

 tion briefly treatedX 1908. Banks, pp. 13, 20, 32 ; Bonnet, p. 259 (condensed 



from Neumann), figs. 28-30 (poor) ; Nuttall (VII), p. 16 (oviposition described 

 and figured) ; Nuttall, Cooper and Robinson, p. 155 ; Warburton (IV), p. 508 



(difficulties of classification discussed). 1909. Blanchard, pp. 145-147 (generic 



characters defined, key to species following Neumann) ; Hunter (VI), p. 255 

 (thinks ground birds disseminate immature stages) ; Rohr, p. 141 (nothing 



original, quotes Neumann and Aragao). 1911. Neumann (a), p. 105 (gives 



key to 13 .species recognised as valid together with brief notes on 13 doubtful 

 species ; four species comprise nine subspecies) ; Nuttall, p. 67 (habits of 

 ticks in relation to hosts ; behaviour of male considered) ; Nuttall and 

 Merriman, p. 44 (males of this genus, in common with other Metastriate 

 ticks, have a chitinous flap over the sexual orifice) ; Nuttall and Warburton, 



p. 119 (of this book ; generic characters freshly defined and figured). 1912. 



Hooker, Bishopp and Wood, p. 89 (nothing original) ; Warburton (VII), p. 122 



(generic characters discussed). 1913. Nuttall, p. 195 (structiu-e of hypostome 



and variabiUty observed in the genus) ; Patton and Cragg, p. 627 (genus 

 defined and key for determination taken from Neumann, 1911 a). 



N. I. 23 



