12 B Canadian Arctic Expedition, 1913-18 



Cnemidocarpa rhizopus (Redikorzew) 



See REDIKORZEW, (1908, p. 32 as Styela rhizopus, and 1916, p. 271) and 

 HUNTSMAN (1922) for description and literature. 



Station 43 b, 4 specimens. 



The four specimens in the collection are all very small, being only from 3 to 

 3-5 mm. in diameter. Each possesses a single long, much-branched root, 

 which is as much as 5 mm. long. In shape they are approximately spherical 

 and their surface is entirely covered with sand grains. They correspond in 

 external characters with small specimens of this species obtained in Hudson bay. 



In the single specimen dissected the following characters were determined. 



Musculature much reduced, scarcely extending beyond siphons. 



Tentacles short and about 24 in number. Formula for pharyngeal folds 



Right, Dors. (4) (1) (3) (1) 



Left. " (3) (1) (3) (1) 



Dorsal lamina with smooth undulatory margin. Stomach short, with about 12 

 folds. Anus with about 10 somewhat reflexed rounded lobes. Gonads oval, 

 oblong, or almost globular in shape, directed towards atrium, three on the right 

 side and two on the left. 



The small numbers of tentacles, longitudinal bars, or pharyngeal folds, 

 gastric folds, and anal lobes, as compared with previous accounts for the species, 

 may be referred to the small size of the individual. In the number of the gonads 

 there is agreement with Hudson bay specimens (Huntsman, 1922). 



The records of this species, though few, indicate a circumpolar distribution 

 with little extension into the subarctic. The species has been known from the 

 Siberian arctic coast, Novaya Zemlya, the Murman coast, north-east Greenland, 

 and Hudson bay. 



Goniocarpa lovenii (Kor. et Dan.) 



See VAN NAME (1912, p. 560 as Tethyum coriaceuni) and REDIKORZEW 

 (1916, p. 244, as Goniocarpa coriacea) for description and literature. 



Station 23, 4 specimens. Cape Lisburne, Alaska, 5-10 fathoms, sand and 

 gravel, coll. W. H. Dall, U. S. Nat. Mus. No. 6647, 1 specimen. 



Elsewhere (Huntsman, 1922) I have expressed an opinion on the dis- 

 tinctness of certain of the forms that have been united with this species by 

 Redikorzew (1916) and Hartmeyer (1915). They are indeed nearly related 

 and the majority have not yet been clearly shown to be distinct. There is 

 certainly very considerable individual variation in both external and internal 

 characters. The arctic specimens listed above do not differ essentially, so far 

 as examined, from specimens taken along the Canadian Atlantic and Pacific 

 coasts, for which I have used the names G. placenta and G. coccodes respectively. 

 The specific name of lovenii, given by Koren and Danielssen I use as being the 

 proper one for this species on the authority of Hartmeyer (1915, p. 326 as Styela 

 lovenii) . 



This species is circumpolar and extends in distribution well into the subarctic 

 on all coasts. 



