PRINCIPLES, CANONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS. 59 



REMARKS. "In Latinizing Greek words there are certain rules of or- 

 thography known to classical scholars which must never be departed from. 

 For instance, the names which modern authors have written Azpunemia, 

 Zenophasia, poioceph'ala, must, according to the laws of etymology, be spelt 

 jEpycnemia, Xetwphasia, 2c&&pceocephala. In Latinizing modern words the 

 rules of classic usage do not apply, and all that we can do is to give to such 

 terms as classical an appearance as we can, consistently with the preserva- 

 tion of their etymology. In the case of European words whose orthography 

 is fixed, it is best to retain the original form, even though it may include 

 letters and combinations unknown in Latin. Such words, for instance, as 

 Woodivardi, Knighti, Bullocki, Eschscholtzi, would be quite unintelligible 

 if they were Latinized into Vudvardi, Cnichti, Bullocci, Essolzi, etc. But 

 words of barbarous origin, having no fixed orthography, are more pliable, 

 and hence, when adopted into the Latin, they should be rendered as classical 

 in appearance as is consistent with the preservation of their original sound. 

 Thus the words Tockus, awsuree^ argoondah, kitndoo, etc., should, when 

 Latinized, have been written Toccus, ausnre, argunda, cundii, etc. Such 

 words ought, in all practicable cases, to have a Latin termination given 

 them, especially if they are used generically." (B. A. Code.) 



RECOMMENDATION II. In Latinizing personal names only 

 the termination should be changed, except as in cases provided 

 for under Recommendation IV. 



REMARKS. "In Latinizing proper names, the simplest rule appears to 

 be to use the termination -us, genitive -/, when the name ends with a conso" 

 nant ; . . . . and ~ius, gen. -//, when it ends with a vowel, as Latreille^ 

 Latreillii, etc." (Z?. A. Code.) Since proper names for species, however, 

 are used mainly and we recommend that they be so used exclusively in 

 the possessive case, a still simpler and now generally adopted rule is to add 

 an i to the name; as, Latreille, Latreillei; Hale, Halei ; Baird, Bairdi; 

 but euphony may in some instances require the fuller form, and here as 

 in many other instances is a case where an author has the opportunity of 

 displaying his good taste. It should be understood that this rule does not 

 apply to names which are already Latin or Latinized in the nominative case. 

 Thus Lhin&us should become Linn&i ; Cygncens, Cygncei j Gunnerus, 

 Gunneri ; Nathnsius, Nathusii ; Nicolaus, Nicolai ; not Linnceusi, 

 CygiHzusi, Gnnneriisi, Nathusiusi, Nicolausi. The same principle may also 

 be safely followed in cases where the form of the name is perfectly Latin, 

 though there may be some doubt whether it originally was Latinized or not ; 

 as, Baldauii from Baldamus, Blasii from Blasius; not Baldcumisi, Blasiusi. 

 If the name were Blase, the genitive would be Blasei, as distinctive from 

 Blasii. Tin's recommendation of applying the regular Latin genitive when- 

 ever possible without obscuring the name, is particularly to be observed in 



