Table 6 (Continued; 



Job 



Wagon seat 



26. Privy 



27. Chicken coop 



28. Step ladder 



29. Xest for laying hens 



30. Batten door 



31. Hammer handle 



32. Pick handle 



33. Implement shed 



34. Kitchen table 



35. Xest for setting hens 



36. Hatchet handle 



37. Smoke house 



38. Oats sprouter 



39. Jockey stick 



40. Kitchen sink 



41. Sledge handle 



42. Wood shed 



43. Milking stool 

 ^4. Watering trough 



45. Flight of steps 



46. Wagon top 



47. Hand sled 



48. Chicken crate 



49. File handle 



50. Well covering 



51. Ice house 



52. Potato marker 



53. House ladder 



54. Land leveler 



55. Mortar box 



Frequency per 

 400 farms 

 39 

 38 

 37 

 37 

 36 

 34 

 34 

 34 

 34 

 33 

 33 

 31 

 31 

 30 

 30 

 30 

 30 

 29 

 28 

 28 

 27 

 27 

 26 

 25 

 24 

 22 

 21 

 21 

 20 

 20 

 20 



Frequency per 

 1000 farms 

 97.5 

 95. 

 92.5 

 92.5 

 90. 

 85. 

 85. 

 85. 

 85. 

 82.5 

 82.5 

 77.o 

 77.5 

 75. 

 75. 

 75. 

 75. 

 72.5 

 70. 

 70. 

 67.5 

 67.5 

 65. 

 62.5 

 60. 

 55. 

 52.5 

 52. 5 

 50. 

 50. 

 50. 



The above table covers 58 out of 122 jobs reported on. Those not listed 

 occur less than 50 times per 1000 farms. The table covers only such repair 

 work as was performed on objects not originally built by the farmers. Repair 

 work on objects built by farmers is included in Table 5. 



The graph shows, furthermore, the necessity of teaching cer- 

 tain things that are not at present a part of the school program. 

 fust what these things are. varies from school to school. 



Repair Work in Wood. In interpreting Table 6 it must be 

 kept in mind that the table covers only such repair work as was 

 performed on objects not originally built by farmers. This ac- 

 counts for the lower frequency shown for repair work as compared 

 with construction work in the same material. As the results stand, 

 they argue in favor of teaching considerable construction work 

 as much as is practicable considering that repair and construction 

 work niu.-'t always be regarded as a minor in agriculture. If, on the 

 other hand, the relative frequency of repair work as such, were 



