/. ricinus 145 



II, PL LXVI, Fig. 152 ((J).— Koch, 1835-44, Heft 5, Fig. 11 {reduvius ?); 

 Heft 37, Figs. 5-7 (ricinus <J, 9 s), Fig. 8 (sciuri) ; Heft 39, Fig. 11 

 (lacertae), Figs. 3, 4 (fuscus <J, 9), Fig. 7 (>m/w, 9 ).— Pagenstecher, 1861, II, 

 PL I, Figs. 1-10 ; PL II, Figs. 1-22. Really excellent figures of anatomy.— 

 Megnin, 1867, I, PL IV.— Murray, 1877, Fig. 2 (fodiens; figure useless).— 

 Haller, 1882, PL V, Fig. 4 (ricinus).— Braun, 1883, Figs. 55, 56 (ricinus).— 

 Railliet, 1886, p. 348 (ricinus).— Aurivillius, 1886, Figs, a and 6 of 9 ; very 

 poor. — Berlese, 1888, fasc. xlix, PL VI (reduvius, $ dorsum, venter, capitulum 

 and scutum, etc. ; poor) ; 1889, fasc. lv, No. 16, giving generic characters 

 of Ixodes : £ venter and spiracle ; 9 capitulum in ventral aspect, capitulum, 

 scutum, spiracle ; larva, ventral aspect ; a digit. Outline figures, recognizable 

 as ricinus. — Neumann, 1888, Fig. 47. — Canestrini, 1890, PL XLIII, Figs. 1-1 g 

 (I. reduvius) : <$ venter, hypostome ; 9 dorsum (fed and unfed), part of 

 capitulum, digit, etc. (very poor). Figs. 3-3 6 " Phaulixodes ru/us (Koch)" 

 dorsum, digit, hypostome ; scarcely recognizable. — Blanchard, 1890, Figs. 592- 

 595 (ricinus). — Neumann, 1892, Figs. 53-55. — Megnin, 1892, Fig. 4 ; outline 

 figures of egg, larva, nymph and female, with details all very inaccurate. — 

 Mosler and Peiper, 1894, Fig. 110 (ricinus). — Neumann, in Railliet, 1895, Fig. 

 481 ; reproduced by Salmon and Stiles, 1901, Fig. 222, and by other authors ; 

 <J venter, capitulum, tarsus 4 and foot. Somewhat schematic (reduvius). — 

 Gene, in Railliet, 1895, Fig. 480 ( $ ovipositing, original figure by Gen£). — 

 Braun, 1895, Figs. 127, 128 (ricinus). — Megnin, 1895, figs, worthless, of different 

 stages.— Osbom, 1896, Fig. 155; poor.— Niles 1 , 1898, PL IV, Figs. 3-6 (ricinus). 

 —Morgan 1 , 1899, Pis. VII, VIII, Figs. 1-5 (ricinus).— Neumann, 1899, Fig. 1, 

 <$ 9 digits (reduvius) ; Figs. 2, 3, hypostome and digit of $ and 9 (ovatus), here 

 reproduced. — Wheler, 1899, pp. 38, 39 (reduvius), various stages, £ , J, o and 

 larva, from photographs of mounted and unmounted specimens ; somewhat 

 too freely retouched. — Lewis, 1900, figures illustrating process of copulation. — 

 Salmon and Stiles, 1901, coloured Plate XCIII, Figs. 223, 224, $ (gorged), 

 much enlarged, dorsum and venter ; PL XCIV, Figs. 225, 226, 9 capitulum in 

 ventral aspect, capitulum and scutum, much enlarged (they omit lateral grooves 

 on scutum). — Kossel, Schiitz, Weber and Miessner, 1903, Pis. I— III, 18 

 excellent photomicrographs of all stages, with details of structure. — Mohler, 

 1905, PL I, Figs. 2, 2 a, 2 6 (9 sketchy, coloured).— Nordenskiold, 1905, text- 

 figures, illustrating anatomy and histology. — Wheler, 1906, Pis. VII, VIII, 

 reproductions of photographs of (a) mounted specimens ( $ and $ ), poor ; and 

 (6) of unmounted ( <$ , 9 dorsum and venter, o and larva ; here reproduced) ; 

 PL X, Fig. 38, shows an abnormality : a 9 minus capitulum ; Fig. 36 ( £ and 

 9 in copula) ; other figures illustrate gorged 9 1 an d 9 ovipositing. — Donitz, 

 19Q7, PL VI, Figs. 34-36, 38, <$ and 9 capitula, $ venter ; good.— Banks, 



1908, PL II, Figs. 9, 10, 13 ; PL IX, Fig. 5, brief description of 9 only ; figures 

 relate to 9 and are poor.— Bonnet, 1908, p. 254, Figs. 15, 16 ; poor. — 

 Nordenskiold, 1908, Pis. XXVI-XXVIII, Text-tigs, a and 6; histology, im- 

 portant. — Nuttall, 1908, Figs 5-7, o, larva, £, reproduced here. — Blanchard, 



1909, p. 91, Figs. 102-105 (after Neumann and Bonnet).— Samson, 1909 a, 

 Pis. IX-XII, 18 text-figs, (anatomy, histology and biology); 1909b, PL IX, 



1 Inaccessible, cited by Salmon and Stiles, 1901. 



