322 



SIMMARIES OF THE HISTOLOGIC CHARACTERS, ETC. 



Sural \uv Hi Table I' — It* cn/iiiulation of the Sum-totals of the Reaction-intensities of the Starches of all of the Hybrids as regards 



Excess, '•< i I' <•< o] 1 1 ■ lopment of Different Hybrids in relation to the Parents. 



Bybrids 



lonna sandarce all 



Brunsdonna sanderce 



Hippeastrum titan-cleonia 



pyrrha. 

 Hippeastrum dreones-zephyr 



I •■ thu andromeda 



' albert 



Crinum bybridum j. c. h 



( Irinum l ircape . 



Crinum powellii 



dainty maid 



ii of roses 



Nerine giantess 



ad ince 



Nerine glory of sarnia 



Narcissus i ticus berrick 



i poel Mu s dante 



Narcissus poetaz triumph 



us fierj cross 



US doubloon 



Narcissus cresset 



us will scarlet 



jus bicolor apricot 



us madame de graaff. . . 

 Narcissus pyramus 



-us lord roberts 



Narcissus agnes harvey 



us j. t. bennett poc 



I. ilium marhan 



I. ilium dalhansoni 



I. ilium golden gleam 



Lilium testaceum 



I, ilium burbanki 



Iris ismali 



Iris dorak 



Iris nu 



Iris purednd 



Gladiolus colvillei 



Tritonia crocosnueflora 



I inia mrs. heal 



nis en dgn 



ii Julius 



■ess 



Richardia mrs. roosevelt 



Musa III-.!' 



Phaius hybridus 



Miltonia bleuana 



Cymbidium eburneo-lowianum . 



Calanthe veitchii 



( lalanthe bryan 



Same as 

 seed 



parent. 



Same as 

 pollen 

 parent. 



Dumber "f reactions 



at of 1018 reactions 



Per ecu' I of intermediateness, highest and lowest. 



4 

 6 

 2 

 3 





 8 

 15 

 

 4 

 

 1 

 2 

 2 

 3 

 1 

 

 1 

 2 

 1 

 2 

 2 

 2 

 3 

 4 

 1 

 3 

 4 

 2 

 

 4 

 4 

 4 

 2 

 3 

 5 

 

 3 

 7 

 2 

 9 

 

 1 

 2 

 1 

 I 

 1 

 3 

 4 

 2 

 1 



137 

 13.4 



Same as 



both 

 parents. 







n 



3 







2 

 

 

 12 

 1 

 3 

 2 

 1 

 G 

 3 

 fi 

 3 

 4 

 2 

 2 

 1 

 3 

 1 

 1 

 2 

 

 1 

 

 

 5 

 1 

 4 

 3 

 1 

 2 

 3 

 1 

 2 

 

 1 

 

 



1 



3 





 3 



3 

 





 1 

 



01 

 9.2 



1 



1 



8 

 8 

 9 



r, 





 

 

 

 7 

 7 

 7 

 7 

 8 

 

 

 1 

 

 1 

 



1 

 1 







1 

 1 



1 





 9 

 9 

 5 

 2 

 1 

 2 

 2 

 3 

 5 

 1 

 2 

 2 

 

 

 

 4 

 

 5 

 3 

 9 

 

 



Inter- 

 mediate. 



13S 

 13.6 



36.2 



2 

 4 

 3 



r. 

 n 



7 

 5 

 18 



2 

 6 

 3 

 6 

 S 

 1 

 3 

 4 

 

 2 

 4 

 

 2 

 2 

 1 

 2 

 4 

 3 

 

 6 

 9 

 2 

 7 

 6 



12 

 1 

 1 

 5 

 4 



16 



11 

 7 

 4 

 2 

 3 

 2 



11 

 1 

 

 5 



11 



Highest. 



236 



23.2 



3 

 3 

 5 



11 

 5 

 

 1 

 2 

 2 



21 

 8 



11 

 1 

 1 

 

 2 

 1 



20 

 2 





 3 

 4 

 

 1 

 4 

 

 1 

 8 

 1 

 2 

 7 

 6 

 

 1 



11 

 4 

 5 

 

 3 

 

 1 

 4 

 3 

 4 

 

 3 



17 

 

 4 

 1 



187 

 18.4 



Lowest. 



13 



M 



4 



1 



4 



1 



3 



7 



1 







2 



2 



4 



9 

 10 



2* 



0* 



1 



3 



2* 



2* 



0* 



3* 



2* 



2* 



1* 



1* 



0* 



5 



1 



4 



4 

 16 

 16 



4 

 17 



6 

 14- 



2 



1 



2* 



0» 



0* 



1* 

 20 



3 



2 



ta 



i* 

 o* 



226 



22.2 



i.'; $ 



♦Number of reactions — 10 or 13. 



Reaction-] censities oi Each Ih brid Starch in 



i,'i i \ii'i\ to Sameness and Inclination to 



i; mu Parent and Both Parents. 



(Table G.) 



Tin data included in Table F, Parts l to 50, can In 1 

 given ;i setting thai will show quite clearly, although 

 omewhal grossly, the comparative d< of influence 



thai have been exerted by each of the parents on the 

 properties of the starcli of the hybrid Such a presenta- 

 tion will be found in Table <■. From the figures here 

 formulated it will be - i that the various hybrids ex- 



luliit the widesl differences in their parental bearings, 

 there being all gradations between one extreme where 

 with tin' exception of 3 reactions of 26 there is same- 

 ni- inclination to the seed parent (as in Wcemanthus 

 leonig albert and r>c<i<>ni<i mrs. heal) anil the other ex- 

 treme where with the exception of 1 or •»' reactions of 

 26 the < orn sponding relationship is borne to the pollen 

 parent (as in crinum hybridum j. r. Ii., ('. powellii, 

 ''hi, ami Musa hybrida). In most of the 

 hybrids there is a quite definite leaning to one or the 

 other parent. In summing up the total number of reac- 

 tions in each column it is found that of 1,018 reaction? 



