Acceptable v Needs revision Reject 



Contractor Report Evaluation Form date: ^ / ^^-pi f 'J 



Contractor: h 1 k^^ Sir^iy\ 



Report Title: S-Jn-c^^^^ i>'^'(i^.>^^ Pilcoro^ o^co^ j / ? ?S^ 

 Report Date: A-^^ ^93^ 

 reviewed by: ♦Vftr-- I^l^L-^^^j ^ 

 QUESTIONS, REVISION JffiC^lJ^MENTS: 



LC- 



Subsampling 



1 . Did the contractor follow the specified sub-sampling procedures? y^ 



2. Are subsamples in the range of 270-330 organisms? /---^ 



3. Is the proportion of the sample that the contractor subsampled documented? J^ 



Taxonomy - — — — .--- 



3. Is the taxonomic resolution consistent with the SOP's? 



U- 



Data Analysis 



4. Is the correct set of metrics used for impairment rating? i^ 



5. Was an appropriate reference used for the analysis? l^ 



6. Did the contractor use replicate information in evaluating the level of resolution if 

 appropriate? /i^j4- 



7. For reports where time trends are being evaluated: Did the contractor account for any 

 differences in taxonomic resolution between years, etc? , ^ 



