1304(f) CRITFC ' This application proposes ttel the Council develop procedures to resolve 

 disputes in program- implementatioh.- using a-process whereby any tnbe or agency could file a 

 ■petition which the Council would mvestigate-ano report on with m 60 days. Council staff proposes 

 rejection of this applfcation on the gnaund that it would be less effective than existing measures. 

 (^6 U.S C 839b{h)(7).) Section 1304(a) of the program reguires Bonneville and other agencies to 

 provide the Council and other interested parties with written explanations when implementation of 

 any measure is believed to be impracticable Section 1304(c) of the program and 4(h)(ll) of the 

 Act call for Bonneville and others to establish consultation ana coordination procedures. In 

 addition. Council staff has a quarterly recorting system oesigned to identify problems m program 

 implementation. The staff frequently is involved m resolving problems m program implementation 

 as well 



1504(32. 6-. 10) CBFWC This application would call for studies to help max imize the efficiency of 

 existing adult migrant protection facilities and operations at mamstem hydropower projects. 

 Because of sections 604(a)(i)-(3) and 1504 (action item 32.2) m the program, the proposed 

 change would be less effective than existing program measures. Therefore, the staff recommends 

 rejection of this proposal (See 16 U S C 839b(h)(7)(C) ) 



1504(32. 3)C0E Application 1504(32 3i COE woulc commue feasibility studies to improve fish 

 guidance efficiency at Bonneville Dam s second powemouse and change (to January of each year 

 beginning m 1987) the date for submitting to the Council a work plan and schedule for 

 modifications Staff proposes to accept the portion of the application that concerns continued 

 feasibility studies, but proposes to reject the proposed change m reporting dates and the proposed 



-180- 



