m 



Quality Assurance 



Several steps were taken to assure that the study results are accurate and reproducible. 

 Upon receipt of the samples, station and sample attribute data were recorded in the Montana 

 Diatom Database and the samples were assigned a unique number, e.g., 2951-01. The first part 

 of this number (2951) designates the sampling site (Eagle Creek near mouth) and the second part 

 (01) designates the number of periphyton samples that that have been collected at this site for 

 which data have been entered into the Montana Diatom Database. Samples were collected at 

 locations close to these sites in 2002 (Bahls 2003). 



Sample observations and analyses of soft (non-diatom) algae were recorded in a lab 

 notebook along with information on the sample label. A portion of the raw sample was used to 

 make duplicate diatom slides. The slide used for the diatom proportional count will be 

 deposited in the Montana Diatom Collection at the University of Montana Herbarium in 

 Missoula. The duplicate slide will be retained by Hannaea in Helena. Diatom proportional 

 counts have been entered into the Montana Diatom Database. 



Results and Discussion 



Results are presented in Tables 4, 5 and 6, which are located near the end of this report 

 following the references section. Appendix A consists of a series of diatom reports, one for each 

 sample. Each diatom report contains an alphabetical list of diatom species and their percent 

 abundances, and values for 65 different diatom metrics and ecological attributes. 



Sample Notes 



Eagle Creek below Highway 236. The sample from this site was putrid but OK. 

 Diatom epiphytes were extremely heavy on the filamentous green algae (e.g., Cladophora). 



Eagle Creek near mouth. The sample from this site was putrid and soft algae were in 

 poor condition. Fine through coarse sediment was very heavy. 



