Quality Assurance 



Several steps were taken to assure that the study resuhs are accurate and reproducible. 

 Upon receipt of the samples, station and sample attribute data were recorded in the Montana 

 Diatom Database and the samples were assigned a unique number, e.g., 3067-01 . The first part 

 of this number (3067) designates the sampling site (Collar Gulch at headwaters) and the second 

 part (01) designates the number of periphyton samples that that have been collected at this site 

 for which data have been entered into the Montana Diatom Database. 



Sample observations and analyses of soft (non-diatom) algae were recorded in a lab 

 notebook along with information on the sample label. A portion of the raw sample was used to 

 make duplicate diatom slides. The slide used for the diatom proportional count will be 

 deposited in the Montana Diatom Collection at the University of Montana Herbarium in 

 Missoula. The duplicate slide will be retained by Hannaea in Helena. Diatom proportional 

 counts have been entered into the Montana Diatom Database. 



Results and Discussion 



Results are presented in Tables 3, 4 and 5, which are located near the end of this report 

 following the references section. Appendix A consists of a series of diatom reports, one for each 

 sample. Each diatom report contains an alphabetical list of diatom species and their percent 

 abundances, and values for 65 different diatom metrics and ecological attributes. 



Sample Notes 



Chicago Gulch. All three samples from Chicago Gulch contained moss. The sample 

 fi-om the lower site (BLM boundary) was incompletely preserved and covered with a pellicle of 

 fungus. The sample from the upper site was tan in color and extremely silty. The moss in this 

 sample was smothered with organic matter and silt. 



