* 
- brothers, Col.nel John Hamilton and Robert Buchanan, Esq., 
lxviii À SKETCH OF THE LIFE OF 
and of the Academy of Sciences at Berlin, etc., and of the Society of Arts of London ; Superin- 
tendent of the Botanic Garden at Calcutta j Trans. Soc. Arts Manuf. and Comm. xlviii. 
439 : 1831. Aikio, for the sake of the vernacular names and the notices rezarding the 
вресіев, incorporated Hamilton’s ‘catalogue in his list, in all cases indicating the source of 
his information by adding— Ham. M'Cosh, who was directed to prepare a topographical 
account of Assam, in 1837 extracted from Aikin's List (which Pritzel ascribes to Wallich) 
all the entries that Aikin indicates as derived fron Hamilton’s Catalogue, and issued 
them as being ‘a fair statement of the Timbers of Assam.’ 
59. History of Cooch Behar, being an extract of a passage from Dr. Buchanan’s 
account of Rangpur (Rangapura) revised and communicated by Major F. Jenkins. Journ. 
As, Soc. Beng. vii, 1: 1838.—Extracted by, Major Jenkins from the Calcutta copy of the 
Buchanan manuscript. 
60. The History, Antiquities, Topography and Statistics of Eastern India, 
comprising the districts of Behar, Shahabad, Bhagalpoor, Goruckpoor, Dinagepoor, 
Puraniya, Rungpoor, and Assam; in relation to their Geology, Mineralogy, Botany, 
Agriculture, Commerce, Manufactures, Fine Arts, Population, Religion, Education; 
Statistics, etc., surveyed under the orders of the Supreme Government, und collated 
from the original documents at the East India House with the permission of the 
Honourable Court of Directors, by Montgomery Martin. 3 vols. 8vo. London: 1838.— 
The ‘ original documents? in question are Buchanan’s manuscript journals. Тһе 
‘collation’ referred to consists of the omission of passages in which Martin was not 
interested, or which he did not appreciate. (Quarterly Review, No. exxvi, vol. 63; 
Calcutta Review, July 1894.) 
61. The Fish and Fisheries of Bengal [edited, with an introduction and notes, by 
Surgeon-Major Francis Day, Inspector-General of Fisheries in India; from the India 
Buchanan, afterwards Hamilton, omitted from the edition by Montgomery Martin. } 
Calcutta Review. July: 1894.—Extracted by H. Beveridge from the original Buchanan 
8. CONCLUSION. 
There unfortunately appears to be no extant portrait of Francis Ha 
the only clues to his personal appearance 
and the necessarily vague reminscences of his son and successor the late J. B. 
Hamilton, Esq., who was quite à child when his father died. In а letter dated March 
1394, Mr. Hamilton writes :— oe 
2: = 7 oue M of him is that he was a tall man with a very ruddy complexion 
1 At Leny there are portraits of Hamilton's mother a very uandsome lady with a Strong intellectual face, and of his 
but none of himself, 
