ering the dilator ' 

 stimulation caused the \ ol in 

 an inhibition of < - "ii-' 



Rec i procal Innervation of Vascular Area* 



It must imt be imagini >l i I 

 •curring in oi • 

 the body. On the contrary 



its in the I'l 1 supply to diff< I 



example, more I>1<><><1 is required bj 



■ t. and this is insured l.\ di 

 with reciprocal constriction of th< 



• of the relatively 

 dilatation during digest h e acl 



rtriction of tin' other \ that 1 



essitating a more po>n erful 

 the mean pressure. After 1 

 as n role fall bo much as the diasl 

 sure pulse therefoi >mes g 



applied to the \ w ith ei 



thai is throM a on them, w eak< 

 the brain. 



A ample of reciprocal action 



in muscular ■ Tl ■ 



th«. istii>-t. The !■ ■ 



■ entirely at least a 

 l>y hormo 



gen-ion i centration ill, 



local irritants t<> tin- 



menU set in the same 



ficial and perha] 



tion of those < \ 



of skin similarly i "<*! 



dilatation elae* hen I 

 the body, such 

 ran be Bhon ii. i • 

 ipplied 



Ex] 



! bj nui i 

 ulnr ner 



■ • 



