using this parameter. However, it should be noted that our program does not rely on it 

 solely but will use a wide variety of information and data sources in program 

 implementation and evaluation. 



Definition of Socially Acceptable: The plan as developed provides for bear expansion 

 into areas that are biologically suitable and socially acceptable. Some commentors 

 wanted additional definition for this. There are some areas where the presence of grizzly 

 bears is unacceptable due to risks to people and/or bears (urban areas). However, in 

 many areas of southwestern Montana the presence of the bear is acceptable if appropriate 

 programs are in place. That is the intent and direction of this plan. 



Opposition to "planting bears": The plan provides for relocations of bears within the 

 ecosystem for management purposes and for potential future relocations if projected 

 distribution increases do not occur. It also provides for live removal and relocation of 

 bears to other ecosystems or states if such opportunities become available. No 

 relocations to increase distribution or to other ecosystems or states will occur without 

 completing the appropriate public processes and extensive local involvement. 



Risks/Liability from Bears: There was a question raised on who is liable if a bear mauls 

 or kills a person or for any damage done by bears. Grizzly bears inhabit southwestern 

 Montana. As such, the risks associated with them already exist. It is FWP's intent that the 

 programs recommended will keep any risks at manageable levels. If and when court 

 cases are pursued as a result of conflicts with bears the liability, if any, will be 

 determined by the courts. 



Hunting Endangers Lives of Humans as Well as Bears: People who would knowingly 

 choose to hunt grizzlies assume those risks voluntarily. For other people in the field, 

 FWP has many programs — such as its hunter safety classes — to minimize risks to other 

 humans through understanding and awareness education. Hunting as conducted in 

 Montana is a safe activity, and FWP continues its years of work to make it more so. 



Need Fewer Bears in Montana Because There are People Here and Their Needs are 

 Increasing: Based on current information as presented in the plan, Montana can expect 

 numbers of both people and bears to continue to increase into the foreseeable future. 

 This makes a management program necessary in assuring coexistence. 



26 



