(.( 138 ) 



work for others ;. this farm will employ 

 Jiim conftant'ly, and he muft work like an 

 horfe to do it. After all, the lofs rem^ia- 

 ing, amounts to the intereft of his money. 

 Can any thing prove ftronger the unpro- 

 jfitablenefs of fuch. a farm ? It is ufelefs to 

 vary this quantity to 4- grafs and ^ arable ; 

 and, to all grafs, the proportion will remain, 

 .and it would at laft be found that all arable 

 is the only mode in which it would pay; 

 and the account varies not at all from the 

 'Jaft*)f the clay and-loam. 

 O If feeking fuch proportions of arable and 

 grafs (and other points) as would pre- 

 cifely keep the man and horfes in regular 

 and profitable employment, could be an- 

 fwered" in a farm to be flocked by 100 /. 

 the variations fhould be extended; but there 

 is no fuch thing. A much larger capital is 

 requifue to keep even 2 horfes conftantiy 

 at work, fo as they ihall not ftop' for want 

 of the man, nor the man for the want of 

 -the horfes. 



Recapitulation. 



' Demanding the moft advantageous me- 

 thod of difpoiing ico /, in farming, the an- 

 fwers are : 



An 



