(( * 



N e i. - 231 17 i' 



2. - ;,{{ IT/ 266 3 O 



i- - sS.8 *5 o 



4. - - 599 14 6 



5- - 335 *4' 8 t 



6. *" ^ A - - 305 13 6 



The comparifon between thefe films and 

 the profit, provds at once the importance df 

 a man's considering well, before he engages 

 in any fkrm. The difference between fome 

 of them is prodigious ; nor can any thing 

 better difplay the g*eat variations of profit 

 from different ways of management : And 

 the contrafts of thefe methods will yet fur- 

 ther appear,- from thq following table of 

 the proportion of the profit. 



Farms, ProduR. Profit per cent. 



N*i- -*i 'w ?t -9 5 o 



-. r 43 *4 l6 9 



5. 35 o o 12 2 o 

 4- f- . 3 8 12 13 o 



5. ^ 341547 10 7,0 



6. - 32 i o 10 9^ o 



Here it appears that, one farm pays 



almoft double the intereft of another ; an 



immsnfe difference, and Claims, in the 



5 ilrongeft 



