CONCLUSION. 



Having carried the same law at the foundation to 

 inquiry within the various subjects, and having found 

 that it is equal to the occasion in accounting for every 

 phenomenon. It does not appear reasonable that the 

 reader will doubt the truth of the law being all that 

 the writer claims it to be, especially when you come 

 to consider the various subjects which are, apparently, 

 no way connected with each other, and each of the sub- 

 jects surrounding truth when questioned within the 

 code of inquiry. 



Subjects that the reader would naturally believe 

 to be impossible of solution within any one law; yet 

 they all surrender to the one when questioned w r ithin 

 the true order of its working method revealed to all in 

 the light of their respective senses. 



The law being one in which the inquirer w.ill have 

 to search for a condition in which it will not apply, in- 

 stead of searching for condition on which to carry out 

 a false deduction. The author ventures to say that man 

 cannot find a condition in nature where the law will 

 not apply. More than that, man cannot find any 

 method of action, movement or change capable of be- 

 ing applied by his own handiwork, but what will have 

 to conform to the working law as herein described. 

 He not being able to construct any mechanical contriv- 

 ance of any form but what will have its foundation in 

 the law herein described. 



259 



;iTY 1 



