— an apparent distribution which must not, however, be con 

 founded with their actual distribution through the regions of 

 space. We now, therefore, proceed to the consideration of 

 the remarkable differences presented by their individual forms, 

 which are either regular (globular, more or less elliptical, an- 

 nular, planetary, or resembling the photosphere surrounding 

 a star) or irregular, and almost as difficult to classify as those 

 of the aggregated aqueous vapor of our atmosphere — the 

 clouds. The elliptical (spheroidal) form* has been regarded 

 as the normal type of nebula; ; this form is most readily re- 

 solved into clusters of stars when it assumes a globular shape 

 in the telescope ; but when, on the other hand, with instru- 

 ments of equal powers, it appears much flattened, elongated 

 in one dimension, and discoidal, it is less easy of resolution.! 

 Gradual transitions of form from the round to the elonsrated, 

 elliptical, or awl-shaped form, are of frequent occurrence in 

 the heavens. (Philos. Transact., 1833, p. 494, pi. ix., figs. 

 19-24.) The nebula is always condensed around one or more 

 central points (nuclei). It is only by a discrimination between 

 round and oval nebula that we recognize double nebidce ; for 

 as no relative motion is perceptible among the individual neb- 

 ulous bodies, either in consequence of its absence or its ex- 

 treme slowness, we are deficient in a criterion by which to 



p. 79.) This early recognition of binary systems, long before that of £ 

 Ursaa Maj. {Cosmos, vol. iii., p. 185), is the more remarkable, as Lacaille, 

 seventy years later, did not describe a Crucis as a double star; perhaps 

 (as Riimker conjectures), because the main star and the companion were 

 then not sufficiently distant from each other. (Compare Sir John Her- 

 6chel, Observations at the Cape, § 183-185.) Richaud also discovered 

 the binary character of a Centauri almost simultaneously with that of a 

 Crucis, and fully nineteen years before the voyage of Feuillee, to whom 

 Henderson erroneously attributed the discovery. Richaud remarks 

 " that, at the time of the comet of 1G89, the two stars which form the 

 double star a Crucis were at a considerable distance from each other; 

 but that in a twelve-feet refractor both parts of a Centauri could be dis- 

 tinctly recognized, and appeared to be nearly in contact. 



* Observations at the Cape, § 44, 104. 



t Cosmos, vol. iii., p. 140, and note. As we have already remarked in 

 reference to clusters of stars (Ibid., p. 143), Mr. Bond, of the United 

 States, succeeded, by means of the great space-penetrating power of 

 his refractor, in completely resolving the very elongated, elliptical neb- 

 ula of Andromeda, which, according to Bouillaud, had been already 

 described before the time of Simon Marius in 985 and 1428. It has a 

 reddish light. Near this celebrated nebula lies the still unresolved, 

 but very similarly shaped nebula, discovered on the 27th of August, 

 1783, by my honored friend, Miss Caroline Herschel, who died at au 

 advanced age, universally esteemed. (Philos. Transact., 1833. No. 61 

 of the Catalogue of Nebula;, fig. 52.) 



