TREATISE ON MILCH COWS. 



having reference merely to the size of the Cows, and serving to distinguish animals which, 

 being the same in respect to the characteristic signs tliat serve to fix the class and the order to 

 which lliey belong, difler in hight alone, and in their yield so far only as this is dependent upon 

 size. 



By means of this classification, which is no less clear and distinct than simple, we are enabled, 



1st To distinguish with ease, in any herd of Cows, each individual comprised in it, according to 

 the .quantity of milk .vhich she is capable of jnelding — from twenty-six quarts a day down to next 

 to nothing, and all intermediate quantities. 



2d. To know the qualities of the milk which each will give, as being creamy or serous. 



3d. To determine during what time, after being got with calf, the Cow will continue to give 

 milk. 



This method — so precious, from the application of which it is susceptible, whether we bo con- 

 cerned in the yield of milk only, or whetlier ■we avail ourselves of it for the improvement of breeds, 

 which are constantly liable to deterioration from miemanagement in crossing — acquires a new in- 

 terest when we consider that it is applicable, not to full grown animals alone, but also to calves at 

 60 early, an age as three months. Thus, on the one hand, it affords the means of forming a sure 

 judgment of full grown animals, in regard to which we are often misled, by their form and their 

 parentage, to entertain great expectations which are never realized ; and, on the otlier hand, it se- 

 cures the improvement of herds, by enabling us to dispose at once of those calves which can nev- 

 er repay the trouble and cost of reai'ing them. 



This important end, hitherto so vainlj' aimed at, had it at length been attained ? To ascertain 

 this point is the doty ^vilh -which }"Our Committee were charged. The method of M. Gu^uon 

 having been revealed to tliem, it remained to ascertain how far the essential signs upon which it 

 rests might be susceptible of rigorous application. 



With this view tliey passed several days in visiting a number of pasture fields, situated in local- 

 ities that diifered from each other, in order diat the experiments might be made upon animals of 

 different breeds, and under varjing circumstances. They deem it proper to enter here into some 

 details respecting their mode of proceeding, persuaded that you will thereby be the better enabled 

 to understand and appreciate the merits of this metliod, and to form a correct judgment of the ex- 

 tent to which your protection is due to a discoverj-, which is submitted to you by the author with 

 the greater confidence, because it bears directly upon the prosperity of tlie agriculturist. 



Every Cow subjected to examination ■was separated from the rest. What M. Gueuon had to 

 say in regard to her was taken down in writing by one of the Committee ; and immediately after 

 the proprietor, who had kept at a distance, was interrogated, and such questions put to him as 

 would tend to confirm or disprove tlie judgment pronounced by M. Guenon. In this way wc 

 have examined, in the most careful manner — note being taken of every fact and every observ'aiiou 

 made by any one present — upward of sixty Cows and Heifers; and we are bound to declare 

 that every statement made by M. Gueuon with respect to each of them, whether it regarded tlie 

 quantity of milk, or tlie time during which the Cow continued to give milk after being got %\iih 

 calf, or, finally, the quality of the milk as being more or less creamy or serous, was confirmed, and 

 its accuracy fully established. The only discrepancies which occurred %vere some slight differ- 

 ences in regard to the quantity of milk ; but these, as we afterward fully satisfied ourselves, 

 ^ were caused entirely by the food of the animal being more or less abundant. 



The results of this first test seemed conclusive ; but they acquired ne\v force from those of a sec- 

 ond trial, in which tlie method was subjected to another test, through M. Guenon and his brother. 

 Your Committee, availing themselves of the presence of the latter, caused the same Cows to be 

 examined by the two brothers, but separately; so that, after a Cow had been mspectcd, and her 

 qualities, as indicated by the signs in question, had been pronounced upon by one of the brothers 

 he was made to withdraw ; then the other brotlier, who had kept aloof, was called up, and desired 

 to state the qualities of the same animal. This mode of proceeding could not fail to give rise to 

 differences — to contradictions, even — between the judgments of the two brothers, unless their 

 metliod was a positive and sure one. Well ! Gentlemen, we must say it — this last test was abso- 

 lutely decisive : not only did the various judgments of the two brothers accord perfectly together, 

 but the}' were in pertcct accordance, also, with all that was said by the proprietors in regard to 

 the qualities, good and bad. of every animal subjected to this examination. 



To the proprietors and to the bystanders, all this was the more surprising, trom tne fact that the 

 examination was no less prompt tlian its results were certain. It was, however, easy to perceive 

 that they, ignorant as they were of the nature of the discoven,-, had but little confidence in it : and 

 that tliey ascribed the cunning of M. Gueuon simply to a great practical familiarity with Cowi 



