20 Herbert Spencer. 



Happening to have in my possession early in the summer an ad- 

 vance copy of your programme, it occurred to me that it might 

 be to Mr. Spencer a comfort and a consolation, if not an aid to a 

 renewal of strength, to learn what you were proposing to do; and 

 I therefore sent him a copy of the programme, together with a let- 

 ter of cordirJ sympathy; to which the letter just read is his reply. 

 I subsequently learned, from Mr. W. E. Hughes of Birmingham, 

 the President of the Sociological Section of one of them, that Mr. 

 Spencer had caused the programme and ray letter to be forwarded 

 to societies in England and France engaged in the study and ad- 

 vancement of Evolution Philosophy, as matter of interest to 

 European Evolutionists. 



In listening with pleasure to the essay of the evening, I have 

 found but one statement ojien to criticism. It seems to me Ave 

 may believe the world has been blessed in that Mr. Spencer was not 

 biased by a thorough academical education, but was left to the 

 natural development of his intellectual powers imtrammeled by 

 direct and overmastering academic influences. His refusal to ac- 

 cept the alleged privileges and opportunities of such an education 

 ■while yet a mere boy, marks, to my mind, the early self-recogni- 

 tion of those splendid natural powers by which the world has 

 been already greatly benefited, and will continue to be benefited 

 throughout the ages. I make only a passing allusion to this sub- 

 ject, which it would be out of place to discuss here at length; but 

 I may be permitted to say that the history of the development of 

 the mind and philosophy of Herbert Spencer is most instructive 

 and interesting; that the gi'eat advances in the thought and work 

 of the world are almost never made by those of the "guild," and 

 that we should probably have marred rather than mended if we 

 could have had it otherwise. 



The time allotted me permits mention of only two or three inci- 

 dents in that history. Examination of the original English edi- 

 tion of "Social Statics," published in 1850, discloses to us the 

 action of a mind as yet dominated by its intellectual environ- 

 ment; the facts presented, the line of thought pursued, and 

 the method of treatment adopted, being such as many of his con- 

 temporaries might naturally have employed in dealing with the 

 subject. We find in that work little of the promise of the splendid 

 fruitage we have already garnered from his subsequent works, 

 except that derivable from the exhibition of transparent intellect- 

 ual honesty and love of truth. Turning thence to the American 

 edition of "Social Statics," published by the Apj^letons in 1865, 

 ■we find that Spencer consented with reluctance to its publication 



