neither apple emerged as being clearly superior. Some no- 

 table differences between the two apples were observed, 

 however, and they include: 



On August 29, Paulared was judged more attrac- 

 tive than Zestar! . The less attractive, blotchy pink- 

 ish-red skin color on Zestar! compared to the more 

 extensive red blush of Paulared is the reason. 



Zestar! was sweeter than Paulared on both harvest 

 dates. This is to be expected given the higher 

 soluble solids measured in Zestar!. 



Zestar! was preferred over Paulared in flavor. 

 Zestar! flavor is complex, with balanced sweet- 

 ness, tartness, and aromatics that are perfumy and 

 distinctly floral. The muted flavor and elevated 

 levels of acids were less desirable with Paulared. 



Paulared had a much higher color rating (bright- 

 ness) on August 29 compared to Zestar!. Zestar! 's 

 skin color was lacking, particularly on the second 

 harvest date. 



Paulared appears to have a more uniform shape 

 (round), vs. the more irregular shape of Zestar!. 



The skin of Paulared was much tougher on the first 

 harvest date compared to Zestar!. By the second 

 harvest date they were comparable in skin tough- 

 ness (or tenderness). 



Water core was prevalent in Paulared harvested 

 on August 29, whereas none was observed in 

 Zestar! fruit. 



We conclude that both Zestar! and Paulared have a place 

 in New England orchards, especially where sales are direct 

 to the public. Paulared is an early Mclntosh-like apple with 

 a red blush over green background and fine white flesh. For 

 individuals who are looking for and early Mclntosh-type 

 apple, Paulared is still an excellent choice. Zestar! has an 

 entirely different flavor and appearance, and would likely 

 appeal to people with a different palate. It's excellent and 

 distinctive taste, however, should still please many people. 



ic ic 'k i: ic 



Fruit Notes, Volume 65, 2000 



19 



