440 



INDEX 



dom, 314; his Ingersoll Lecture, 



314 note ; his estimate of Edwards, 



315 seq. 



Haeckel, not to be reckoned a ma- 

 terialist, 122 seq. 



Harris, Dr. W. T., U. S. Commis- 

 sioner of Education, his connex- 

 ion with Hegel's Logic, xxvii ; his 

 part in Concord " symposium " on 

 pantheism, 56 note; place of his 

 system in the Four Groups of 

 Philosophies, 395. 



Hartmann, life-sketch of, 103; his 

 Philosophy of the Uttcotiscious, 105 ; 

 mental lieir of Schopenhauer, 105 ; 

 gives empirical method predomi- 

 nance, 105, 109; pessimism appar- 

 ently his chief motive, 109; his 

 basis of proof for Unconscious, 

 no; his tracing of its historical 

 recognition, no; attempts refuta- 

 tion of Kantian limitation of know- 

 ledge, III ; reminiscent of Spinoza, 

 Twnote; makes Unconscious the 

 source of duplicate phenomenal 

 worlds, III seq. ; holds Mystic and 

 Induction the two organs for know- 

 ledge of Unconscious, 112 ; makes 

 Unconscious a transcending union 

 of Will and Idea, 113 seq. ; asserts 

 preponderance of suffering over 

 happiness, 115; his Three Stages 

 of Illusion, 115, 116; maintains 

 being of world worse than its not 

 being, 116; implies highest ethical 

 precept is Make an end of it ! 116; 

 commends universal self-annihila- 

 tion as means for this, 117; his 

 philosophy of history, of politics, 

 of religion, 118-119; his theory 

 criticised, 120; his services, in 

 common with Schopenhauer, 

 121. 



Hedge, Dr. F. H., puts Leibnitz in 

 dubious company, 349 ; his monism 

 in religion, 350. 



Hegel, monism of, and of his school, 

 ix; permanent debt of philosophy 

 to, xxvii ; in dilemma brought on 



by Kant, takes monistic alternative, 

 with Spinoza, as against agnostic, 

 whether Humian or Kantian, xxxv ; 

 falls into deeper dilemma between 

 saving knowledge at cost of auton- 

 omy or saving autonomy at cost 

 of knowledge, x.\xv-xxxvi ; pan- 

 theism of, questioned but finally 

 admitted, 63 note, and confirmed, 

 67 note ; degeneration of later Ger- 

 man idealism from, 103; indirect 

 debt to, on part of Hartmann, 106; 

 misinterpreted by Hartmann, 114 

 note; one-sided reminiscence of, 

 in Diihring, 123 note ; Aesthetik of, 

 followed in part, 187. 



Heraclitus, among undoubted pan- 

 theists, 63. 



Heredity, attempt to explain con- 

 sciousness of Time by, fails, 19 

 seq., 46 seq. 



Hopkins, Dr. Mark, his signal inno- 

 vation in treatment of Christian 

 evidences, 265 note. 



Hume, detects subjective character 

 of necessity, when self-conscious- 

 ness is taken non-socially, xxxiv, 

 and so discounts in advance Kant's 

 " critical " vindication of its objec- 

 tivity, xxxv ; failure of, to recognise 

 evolution, exposes Kant's rejoinder 

 to him to evolutional objections, 

 19, but rejoinder holds, evolution 

 notwithstanding, 19, 20; supplies 

 drastic cure for agnosticism, 

 through his dissolution of em- 

 piricism, 176 seq. 



Huxley, implies non-evolutional ori- 

 gin of conscience, 49, cf. note 2. 



Ideal, origin of, according to evolu- 

 tional philosophy, i ; spontaneous, 

 essential to the notion of evolution, 

 38 seq. ; as manifested in the three 

 Pure Ideals, 40; with Lange, not a 

 philosophy, but a standpoint, 145 ; 

 substituted by Lange for Absolute, 

 146 St q. ; made the meaning of 

 religion, 155; the, immanent in the 

 actual, 183 seq. ; function of, in 



